this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
317 points (99.4% liked)

politics

24991 readers
2350 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 59 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Everyone on the Epstein list deserves to face open justice.

If he’s innocent he could have just released the list and proven it to the whole world.

I don’t think anyone would even trust that now.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Everyone on the Epstein list deserves to face open justice.

There's no Epstein "list". What we have are his digital Rolodex, his flight logs, his various alleged business associations, and the volume of blackmail that may or may not still exist.

And because Epstein was a major lobbyist and "philanthropist", the end result is different ideological factions cherry picking who they want to blame while waving off their friends as incidental.

Epstein is the pedophile's "Too Big To Fail"

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

That’s kind of just semantics and the frap the Trump admin is doing to say it doesn’t exist.

The FBI definitely has a file on this. They have the contents of his vault, his log books, etc.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

The FBI definitely has a file on this.

Almost certainly. But Mossad has files on the folks running the FBI, so everyone's at a stand-off.

They have the contents of his vault, his log books, etc.

A big part of their job is picking through all of that material and drawing out exactly who was a "client" and who was merely an acquaintance.

But (again, as the Trump freak-out demonstrates) a large part of that work is weeding out people that the FBI Director is friends with and focusing in on people who won't create any collateral damage. Because Epstein was in so deep with so many people, the only target they could really go after was Maxwell. And even she's got enough pull to make keeping her in jail hazardous to a lot of other high ranking bureaucrats.