this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
804 points (97.7% liked)

News

28285 readers
3847 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's nice to see the senate opposition functioning.

Edit: 18 hours of holding the senate floor, giving voice to the american people. Lots of tears as american suffering is read out loud for the congressional record. Testiment from Americans across the country. This is the voice of the people. Please click the link, share and watch. The media needs to know we care about the opposition more than we care about trump rambling on a plane about fort knox.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 35 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I thought the republicans only had to threaten a filibuster but didn't actually have to do it. But democrats have to do it live?

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago

Yes because democrats are pushovers. Everyone knows that. Nice of Booker to show up with his spine and his shit talking voice. He's a legend for this.

We might have to hold the flooor and filibuster for 2 years straight to save old America. Im glad somones got the balls to show up and do it. I'm here for it. In this house all we do is listen to filibuster and support the peoples power.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Technically it isn't a filibuster,

Depending on how long he is able to go, he could disrupt Senate business on Tuesday, though his speech technically isn’t a filibuster — the chamber is currently in a limited period of debate time for Matthew Whitaker’s nomination as ambassador to NATO.

Per https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/03/31/congress/cory-booker-talk-a-thon-00262482

It just behaves as you would expect a filibuster to behave. The standard no-show threatening is still a thing you can do.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

idk where politico and news week are getting their definition of a filibuster, but talking for 24 hours to hold off a nomination vote is a filibuster to me. My community college education may have failed me but i interpret a 25 hour speech on the senate floor a filibuster.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll be honest I assume it's some parliamentary specifics. If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a filibuster to me. Allegedly it isn't, but AFAIK, it is. It's what I expect one to look like. It behaves like one. So it is.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

By definition its a filibuster. I think everyone is saying its not a filibuster, because it can not be stopped through cloture. So under the senates procedures and protocols it cannot be voted down like a filibuster. Not that they have the votes anyway. And the rest are just undermining and don't understand what a filibuster is. It's their first time hearing about it and they are trusting news week to do their thinking.

A filibuster is just a long speech or something to delay the legislative session. it can be used for a specific bill, or as they are using it now, it can be used to delay a nomination vote for 24 hours. RIP NATO.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To be fair, filibuster has two meanings: this, and the other definition being an individual or small group of individuals, acting indepedently, taking over territory of another state in the name of their country. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filibuster_%28military%29?wprov=sfla1

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yes yes. English is hard. Words have 10 meanings and we also use idioms to really make it confusing.

Thats not the meeting we're discussing since its a senator obstructing a legislative body via a long speech which is procedurally allowed.

[–] bluegreenwookie@bookwormstory.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Idk the workings of it but i heard that this type of filibuster hasn't been done in many years. Idk if thats true but that's what i heard

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The distinction everyone is making is usually filibusters are held during a bill debate, before a bill can go to vote. In theory you would have to filibuster indefinitely until one side can get 60 votes to end the filibuster and pass the vote. It forces the other party to gather a larger majority or compromise.

This was delaying a vote on a nomination, it was also proving that they can and will filibuster, not just threaten to filibuster, but talk for 25 hours straight. someone should have continued after him because the nomination passed and i am sad again. 52 votes so more dem defectors yay.

[–] Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

someone should have continued after him because the nomination passed and i am sad again.

Another senator can't take over for Booker, only way it ends is when he cedes the floor. They were only able to ask questions to give him a break.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Fair. I’m no expert in congressional progression or procedures. I probably know more than Donald Trump, but that really doesn’t say much.