▲ 747 ▼ In a now deleted tweet, weirdo Azealia Banks shares that "fucking 14 year old girls was really only made a social taboo in the 1990s" (europe.pub) submitted 1 year ago by bytesonbike@discuss.online to c/political_weirdos@lemmy.world 248 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] simsalabim@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (4 children) That math doesn't hold up at all unless azalea is like pushing 70 or something. Maybe her mom had her at like 45? I'm 40 and my grandparents weren't even born until the late 30s. And that's without child pregnancies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] simsalabim@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Just looked it up, she's 34. So even if her mom was the youngest child of her grandma, she would had to have been 60+ when she had her. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) I think the math is fine? 2025 - 1927 = 98 (years since grandma was born) 98 - 34 = 74 (years between grandma's birth and OP's) 74 / 2 = 37 (average age of grandma and OP's parent when OP's line was born) Note that OP's parent could be her father (assuming the research didn't reveal it was her mother), which means that one generation might not need to avoid menopause age. Grandma could have had OP's father at 27, and then father could have had her with a 27 year old (when he was 47) and it would all work out. Hell, even at the extreme, gma has father at 12, then father has OP at 62 with someone of any age. Not saying it's right; 12 year olds should be playing anything other than baby factory and housemaid to some old fuck. But the math seems fine to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Saying it that way seems more reasonable, but still rather far fetched. Maybe she meant great grandma? permalink fedilink source parent [+] kerntucky@infosec.pub 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (4 children) That math doesn't hold up at all unless azalea is like pushing 70 or something. Maybe her mom had her at like 45? I'm 40 and my grandparents weren't even born until the late 30s. And that's without child pregnancies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] simsalabim@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Just looked it up, she's 34. So even if her mom was the youngest child of her grandma, she would had to have been 60+ when she had her. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) I think the math is fine? 2025 - 1927 = 98 (years since grandma was born) 98 - 34 = 74 (years between grandma's birth and OP's) 74 / 2 = 37 (average age of grandma and OP's parent when OP's line was born) Note that OP's parent could be her father (assuming the research didn't reveal it was her mother), which means that one generation might not need to avoid menopause age. Grandma could have had OP's father at 27, and then father could have had her with a 27 year old (when he was 47) and it would all work out. Hell, even at the extreme, gma has father at 12, then father has OP at 62 with someone of any age. Not saying it's right; 12 year olds should be playing anything other than baby factory and housemaid to some old fuck. But the math seems fine to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Saying it that way seems more reasonable, but still rather far fetched. Maybe she meant great grandma? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] simsalabim@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Just looked it up, she's 34. So even if her mom was the youngest child of her grandma, she would had to have been 60+ when she had her. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) I think the math is fine? 2025 - 1927 = 98 (years since grandma was born) 98 - 34 = 74 (years between grandma's birth and OP's) 74 / 2 = 37 (average age of grandma and OP's parent when OP's line was born) Note that OP's parent could be her father (assuming the research didn't reveal it was her mother), which means that one generation might not need to avoid menopause age. Grandma could have had OP's father at 27, and then father could have had her with a 27 year old (when he was 47) and it would all work out. Hell, even at the extreme, gma has father at 12, then father has OP at 62 with someone of any age. Not saying it's right; 12 year olds should be playing anything other than baby factory and housemaid to some old fuck. But the math seems fine to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Saying it that way seems more reasonable, but still rather far fetched. Maybe she meant great grandma? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Just looked it up, she's 34. So even if her mom was the youngest child of her grandma, she would had to have been 60+ when she had her. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) I think the math is fine? 2025 - 1927 = 98 (years since grandma was born) 98 - 34 = 74 (years between grandma's birth and OP's) 74 / 2 = 37 (average age of grandma and OP's parent when OP's line was born) Note that OP's parent could be her father (assuming the research didn't reveal it was her mother), which means that one generation might not need to avoid menopause age. Grandma could have had OP's father at 27, and then father could have had her with a 27 year old (when he was 47) and it would all work out. Hell, even at the extreme, gma has father at 12, then father has OP at 62 with someone of any age. Not saying it's right; 12 year olds should be playing anything other than baby factory and housemaid to some old fuck. But the math seems fine to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Saying it that way seems more reasonable, but still rather far fetched. Maybe she meant great grandma? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) I think the math is fine? 2025 - 1927 = 98 (years since grandma was born) 98 - 34 = 74 (years between grandma's birth and OP's) 74 / 2 = 37 (average age of grandma and OP's parent when OP's line was born) Note that OP's parent could be her father (assuming the research didn't reveal it was her mother), which means that one generation might not need to avoid menopause age. Grandma could have had OP's father at 27, and then father could have had her with a 27 year old (when he was 47) and it would all work out. Hell, even at the extreme, gma has father at 12, then father has OP at 62 with someone of any age. Not saying it's right; 12 year olds should be playing anything other than baby factory and housemaid to some old fuck. But the math seems fine to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Saying it that way seems more reasonable, but still rather far fetched. Maybe she meant great grandma? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Saying it that way seems more reasonable, but still rather far fetched. Maybe she meant great grandma? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] kerntucky@infosec.pub 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
