you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

https://www.edengreen.com/blog-collection/vertical-farming-crop-yield-per-acre

We're talking about 2 different things. I have zero interest in debunking all your strawmans and assumptions about a completely different concept.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Your article says it's 40:1 instead of the 10:1 I assumed, but that's still far too little to matter.

    Your two floors of farming would still feed less than a hundred people full time, even if they hit those lofty idea targets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    You're the one inserting the assumption that this has to become the only source of food for people.

    I said:

    or source through a local network.

    If you can't read those words and comprehend them than why would I consider anything you have to say?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    What the fuck does local mean? I just showed you the math that even Los Angeles alone consumes more food than you can possibly grow in California.

    You're the one fucking around with "I want a greenhouse above my grocery store" with no real proof that it would matter or be a good use of space.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments