Politico reports that at a Hamptons fundraiser last Saturday, Cuomo told his well-heeled supporters that, contrary to all available evidence, he could win the New York mayoral race as an independent—because he was likely to have the implicit support of President Donald Trump.

The imperative of defeating Mamdani justified the new coalition Cuomo is trying to create of his die-hard loyalists (who are Democrats) with Trump Republicans.

Some of that latter group might be tempted to back Curtis Sliwa, the actual GOP nominee in the race. Cuomo told these donors, “We can minimize [the Sliwa] vote, because he’ll never be a serious candidate. And Trump himself, as well as top Republicans, will say the goal is to stop Mamdani. And you’ll be wasting your vote on Sliwa.” Cuomo went on to emphasize that he’d be a mayor who could find common ground with Trump:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 70 points 1 year ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (25 children)
  • [+] -21 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Better a Liberal than a whiny, non voting tankie. Cuomo is about as liberal as John Fetterman.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    But because of sentiments like this millions of former DNC voters stayed home. That's how we got here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -24 points 1 year ago (15 children)

    damn libtards! They're a bunch of queers!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    I don't understand why you're downvoted. Do people completely ignore context?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Cause people need to stop using that term full stop. It's not 2006 any more

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    It was ironically used as a means to make fun of people who use the term...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Just curious, the word you guys are fighting over us "libtards" or "queers" ?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    The prior former

    Edit: am dumbass

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Sarcasm here is too obvious to be pointed out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I've met plenty of tankies who believe Librulz bad and also that lgbt dont get human rights.

    It's actually a pretty basic stance for them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments