For people who are choosing between Librewolf and Brave

What Librewolf can do (but Brave can’t):

  • Be run in a portable form
  • Duplicate / manage user profiles easily
  • Use a self‑hosted sync server
  • Install most browser plugins on mobile (e.g. Iceraven)
  • Use containers to separate cookies
  • Store browser history permanently

What Brave can do (but Librewolf can’t):

  • Provide a better mobile user experience, including:
    • smoother animations
    • quick switching between tabs (tab icon feature)
  • Translate web pages on mobile devices
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 54 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Brave is being forced to use Googles version of Manifest 3 meaning ad blockers and anti trackers are crippled in favour of advertisers and Googles ad business. Brave will be including 4 manifest 2 extensions in its backend but that's it. They're stuck because Google decided to screw over the entire Chrome based ecosystem.

Mozilla is implementing Manifest 3 differently so the original techniques for adblocking and privacy still work.

So the only choice is Librewolf. Sacrificing privacy and security for smoother animations and Web translation of pages is not worth it.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -41 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    You don't need extensions to block ads in Brave. And as someone (me) prefer not to give market share to Gecko (thus, to Mozilla), Brave it is. Fuck Mozilla.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)