For people who are choosing between Librewolf and Brave

What Librewolf can do (but Brave can’t):

  • Be run in a portable form
  • Duplicate / manage user profiles easily
  • Use a self‑hosted sync server
  • Install most browser plugins on mobile (e.g. Iceraven)
  • Use containers to separate cookies
  • Store browser history permanently

What Brave can do (but Librewolf can’t):

  • Provide a better mobile user experience, including:
    • smoother animations
    • quick switching between tabs (tab icon feature)
  • Translate web pages on mobile devices

all 34 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 54 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Brave is being forced to use Googles version of Manifest 3 meaning ad blockers and anti trackers are crippled in favour of advertisers and Googles ad business. Brave will be including 4 manifest 2 extensions in its backend but that's it. They're stuck because Google decided to screw over the entire Chrome based ecosystem.

Mozilla is implementing Manifest 3 differently so the original techniques for adblocking and privacy still work.

So the only choice is Librewolf. Sacrificing privacy and security for smoother animations and Web translation of pages is not worth it.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -41 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    You don't need extensions to block ads in Brave. And as someone (me) prefer not to give market share to Gecko (thus, to Mozilla), Brave it is. Fuck Mozilla.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    don't use brave for anything; brave is a pro crypto ad infested slop owned by a homophobic bigot

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago* (5 children)

    Well at least it is open source, I guess the best alternative for people who want a chromium based browser with sync feature

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Not necessarily. With the awful things about Brave, if I need a chromium based browser I’ll absolutely go non-OSS and use Vivaldi. It’s a million miles better, and it’s not worth supporting Brave just to say you’re still using an open source browser.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    As a Vivaldi user, I found that no other browser works as well for me, as Vivaldi does. I can't imagine life without browser workspaces, sync, vertical tabs on the desktop, and a mobile tab bar at the bottom.

    The closest alternative is either Floorp or Zen, with mobile Firefox and Sync, but I found Vivaldi is just smoother and a better and more well-integrated user experience for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    I might be wrong, but search results gives "Vivaldi is not entirely open source"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    TLDR: use librewolf and ironfox on mobile I do not trust a for-profit company with something as important as my fucking browser https://redlib.tiekoetter.com/r/browsers/comments/1j1pq7b/list_of_brave_browser_controversies/

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    IronFox is closer to LibreWolf on mobile then IceRaven.

    Both IronFox and IceRaven have extension support :)

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Any oppinions regarding librewolf vs ironfox?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Does LibreWolf come with an adblocker as good as brave and can I play YouTube videos while not having my screen on without paying for YT premium?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Do browsers need to do so much? Many features seem like bloat, not must-haves for the average user.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago

    This 2 are the best in Open Source browsers at this time, you don't have to use all the features but they are there. this post is just for those who are interested in comparing this 2 specific browser to find out which one is most suitable, personally I prefer librewolf.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Brave also offers a few additional, very valuable things:

    • the only app that reflects fingerprinting protection in PrivacyBadger, in my experience
    • works on most webpages
    • selective use of first-party cookies, per site.
  • source
  • [+] -11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I’ve heard that the main dev for LibreWolf is anonymous.
    If that’s true, then there is a possibility that they could easily be a foreign state actor.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments