It was one of the tools that allowed me to maintain healthy credit card usage habits. In my idle time when messing around on my phone I’d gotten into the habit of just transferring money from my checking account to my credit card, often in excess of my actual balance, so as to cover “pending” purchases.

Not only will my bank no longer let me do that, just to twist the knife a bit, they will let me make multiple payments totaling the pending total due so long as no individual payment exceeds my actual balance.

So it’s not that they can no longer handle negative balances on the card, it’s just that they’ve half-ass made the interface disallow it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (16 children)

Sure, so these people could benefit from using a debit card instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (15 children)

    And kill their credit score while they're at it. Which they need for a multitude of other things.

    The system is rigged.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (14 children)

    Sounds like the only option they have left is to ... track their finances?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    See, you're falling right into it. They were tracking things just fine before the rule changed. The rule was changed so the bank could make more money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (12 children)

    No, the standard is to pay the statement balance by the due date in order to not accrue interest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

    Which they were doing?

    Edit: but to the bigger point, why are you so insistent on this here specifically?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (10 children)

    No, they were trying to pay down the balance after each purchase, well before a statement was issued.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    It might not take the form you'd like but isnt that still [paying] the statement balance by the due date in order to not accrue interest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (8 children)

    No, because there isn't a statement yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Alright, now I get the distinction you're making, but was it really harming OP?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)

    Apparently, since they were no longer able to pay off their purchases immediately.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    But that's not their method that's harming them, that's the updates with fewer features, which is what they came here to vent about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    And there are so many solutions available to them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Do you interact with people like this in person?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments