rpg

rpg@ttrpg.network

4,931 readers

8 active

2 users here now

This community is for meaningful discussions of tabletop/pen & paper RPGs

Rules (wip):

Do not distribute pirate content
Do not incite arguments/flamewars/gatekeeping.
Do not submit video game content unless the game is based on a tabletop RPG property and is newsworthy.
Image and video links MUST be TTRPG related and should be shared as self posts/text with context or discussion unless they fall under our specific case rules.
Do not submit posts looking for players, groups or games.
Do not advertise for livestreams
Limit Self-promotions. Active members may promote their own content once per week. Crowdfunding posts are limited to one announcement and one reminder across all users.
Comment respectfully. Refrain from personal attacks and discriminatory (racist, homophobic, transphobic, etc.) comments. Comments deemed abusive may be removed by moderators.
No Zak S content.
Off-Topic: Book trade, Boardgames, wargames, video games are generally off-topic.
No AI-generated content. Discussion of AI generation pertaining to RPGs is explicitly allowed.

founded 3 years ago

moderators

Avogadro@ttrpg.network

sirblastalot@ttrpg.network

TripHammer@ttrpg.network

Primarch@ttrpg.network

BrentTaylor@ttrpg.network

Thoughts on preemptively banning Gen-AI? (ttrpg.network)

submitted 1 year ago by sirblastalot@ttrpg.network [M] to c/rpg@ttrpg.network

70 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've been reading about the user revolt on the Twin Peaks subreddit calling for a ban on AI art. As best I can tell we don't really have people posting AI stuff here yet, but I'm wondering if it would be a good idea to ban it before it becomes a problem. I'm soliciting feedback from y'all on this, please let me know what you prefer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] pteryx@dice.camp -3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Nope, it isn't.

Cheaters should never be allowed to prosper. It undermines the entire idea that creative work is of value, and will inevitably lead to a day when artists are seen as as much of a piece of scum on someone's shoe as cashiers are.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] INeedMana@piefed.zip 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think we are way past the point when creative work is enough

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] pteryx@dice.camp 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So you're arguing so hard to replace artists because you already don't value them?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] INeedMana@piefed.zip -2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

No. For one I don't believe it will replace artists. What I expect is that we will never be able to hold wotc, hasbro, etc to this standard. Which means they'll have an even higher advantage against one-person creators
The artists working for big ones will be using AIGen to speed up their work. Same as using search engines to find info and references
Creators for which the AIGenned cover is enough, won't commission a real artist anyway
I'm afraid that such rule here ( meaning we are social network, not the shop) would skew the scale towards the big ones - they'll be getting more coverage, even here

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] pteryx@dice.camp 6 points 1 year ago

I'm thoroughly unconvinced by the argument that because giant corporations are doing evil things, the little guy ought to as well in order to "compete", and treating "AI" art as the only kind that will be posted either way.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent