you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 86 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (20 children)
  • [–] 43 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    It’s noticeable when you look at the price of the subscription. That’s almost $300 million.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    This is flawed thinking. There is no "them" with a huge salary. The people making decisions are salaried or invested employees, and their livelihood depends on the stock regardless. There isn't "one guy" that this hits, like it would with a salary, there's thousands of investors which must be appeased.

    Also, it's likely many of those canceling were people who didn't use the service as much as power users, which means they're losing the cheapest to maintain customers (industry insight, no research to back this up, to be clear).

    If we had boycotts and cancelations even a quarter this big across other media giants, our media would be a far better place.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    If my googling is right, in total there are ~207 million subscribers.

    This says 128M, which seems far more plausible. https://variety.com/2025/tv/news/disney-stop-reporting-subscriber-numbers-disney-plus-hulu-espn-1236480413/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I don't think those numbers are additive like that - you'd be double-counting people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    They pay more than once as well?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    True - I guess it depends on whether we're defining "subscribers" as people or total paid accounts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments