▲ 879 ▼ Why do you use what I gave you?! (europe.pub) submitted 1 year ago by ramble81@lemmy.zip to c/linkedinlunatics@sh.itjust.works 159 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) That's quite a leap permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] psud@aussie.zone 1 point 1 year ago It's not. By requiring people to take leave you ensure leave is available. My workplace enforces leave by having limits on how much leave you can accrue, if you exceed the limit you are put on leave. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Tinidril@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) You sound like someone with no workforce experience whatsoever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You sound like a manager, looking to control how people handle their vacation time. "Workers get punished for taking vacation" and "workers get punished for not taking vacation" are two sides of the same coin. Personally I'm in favor of "workers can do whatever they want with their PTO without fear of repurcussion". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Tinidril@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago It's not about punishment. If time off is optional than it's a near guarantee that workers will be punished in some way for taking it. At a minimum bosses should have to pay out for unused time off, even though that that will certainly lead to some bosses penalizing those workers. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 point 1 year ago It's not. By requiring people to take leave you ensure leave is available. My workplace enforces leave by having limits on how much leave you can accrue, if you exceed the limit you are put on leave. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) You sound like someone with no workforce experience whatsoever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You sound like a manager, looking to control how people handle their vacation time. "Workers get punished for taking vacation" and "workers get punished for not taking vacation" are two sides of the same coin. Personally I'm in favor of "workers can do whatever they want with their PTO without fear of repurcussion". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Tinidril@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago It's not about punishment. If time off is optional than it's a near guarantee that workers will be punished in some way for taking it. At a minimum bosses should have to pay out for unused time off, even though that that will certainly lead to some bosses penalizing those workers. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You sound like a manager, looking to control how people handle their vacation time. "Workers get punished for taking vacation" and "workers get punished for not taking vacation" are two sides of the same coin. Personally I'm in favor of "workers can do whatever they want with their PTO without fear of repurcussion". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Tinidril@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago It's not about punishment. If time off is optional than it's a near guarantee that workers will be punished in some way for taking it. At a minimum bosses should have to pay out for unused time off, even though that that will certainly lead to some bosses penalizing those workers. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago It's not about punishment. If time off is optional than it's a near guarantee that workers will be punished in some way for taking it. At a minimum bosses should have to pay out for unused time off, even though that that will certainly lead to some bosses penalizing those workers. permalink fedilink source parent
