dylanmorgan comments on Another L for bigotry

People Twitter

10,525 readers

4,867 active

327 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician

https://www.sotwe.com/
https://twitterviewer.net/Note: Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.

If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)

founded 3 years ago

moderators

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

SCOTUS has previously ruled that burning the American flag is protected speech, but I believe they have upheld (or just not heard cases against) state laws that burning crosses is hate speech or threatening speech (which are not protected.)

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 14 points 1 year ago

Yes, SCOTUS has consistently ruled that threats of violence are different than protesting.

Burning a cross on someone's lawn is an implicit threat of future violence because that is the only historical use of burning crosses on someone's lawn. Burning a flag in a public space is saying you disagree with the government, which is a protest.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Burning a cross in America is not a message that you hate Christians. It's deeply associated with the racist organization the ku klux klan and their extrajudicial murders of black people.

So yeah you can do the thing associated with being mad at a country but not the thing associated with "get your melinated skin in line as per our beliefs or we kill your entire family"

permalink

fedilink

source

parent