It's proprietary, after all. I understand paid is fine, but even then, it usually better be open source.

So, why is Unraid an exception ?

Thanks

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 11 months ago (12 children)

The big thing is very easily mix and match different sizes of disks. ZFS as of recently can sort of do that, but its not as efficient.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (6 children)

    Mergerfs can do that too and you can keep the underlying fs as whatever you want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago* (2 children)

    It has no parity, you can pair with snapraid but thats snapshot parity and not real-time parity. Depends on the use case if that would work or not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    Yes, but it does not have redundancy or caching. Redundancy can be achieved with snapraid, but how you get caching I don’t know…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (3 children)

    Can 100% do this. Not just kinda. Works fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    Not really with the same flexibility.

    You only get usable capacity of the smallest disk in a vdev or you have to add a new vdev with your newly sized disks.

    Unraid lets you mix and match however you like and get all the usable capacity (as long as your parity is your largest sized disks).

  • source
  • parent