politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I don't see him popping open his laptop and producing an AI video. This was done by and approved by handlers. And not the smart ones.
Don’t fucking apologize for him. It really doesn’t matter who actually posed anything. The president of the USA official account (from his own social media platform, another big uh oh) posted a video of him as a king using a jet to shit on Americans.
Certainly not doing himself no, but don’t you think he’s petty enough to supervise the whole thing start to finish ?
Reminds of a story from a real Mad Man. Some clients would be shown the best effort, because those people understood the business and could appreciate how it would play.
Others would get three choices, the one they wanted to sell, and two low effort pieces for them to reject. Rejecting the bad ones made the clients feel savvy and in control.
Donnie was shown three videos and 'picked' the best one.
I'd bet money on that.
"Vance, clear my schedule for the next two weeks -- I've got an important project I need to personally oversee."
Not since the second stroke
And...? No one's saying he personally sat down and tweaked prompt engineering. But he's the president, and it's his administration. Remember "The buck stops here"?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck_passing
To them, anything that distracts from Epstein is good.
His MAGats will laugh themselves sick over the video, because that's the kind of thing they would do themselves.
My wife called me while she was driving to work to let me know that there was a large sign hanging on a bridge (major highway) that said "trump loves Epstein"
This is in Texas. Love to see it. We woke now?
That's Barron's job
I was honestly wondering if someone made it in mockery of him, and he doubled down on it...
I think he posts clearly ai videos by design. The other day that Chuck Schumer ai video looked legit. Trump posts videos easily vetted as ai, so his base believes that's what ai looks like. Oversaturated, unnatural, glitched, etc. Now when another branch of the govt posts an ai vid as good as the Schumer one, his base believe its real. "I know what ai looks like, Trump posts funny ai stuff all the time. This didn't looks at all like that so it can't be ai".
While I don't doubt plenty in his administration would think of that, I have trouble seeing him thinking that far ahead.
Could definitely be getting fed AI videos with the hope of him reposting them for that reason, though.
Lol "the smart ones"... Because those exist.
Ok....? And? Therefore?
They’re just pointing out that this guy is so stupid he can’t even use basic tools without help.
That the entire entourage is so stupid actually, or that they know the senate and Congress are too spineless to do anything at all