If you think this started with Silicon Valley that's a mistake

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 1 year ago (46 children)

The scary part of this one is that previously, we had administrations that, while still being right-of-center (yes ML, I know), had at least enough sense to prop things up well enough to recover.

I don’t have faith that the fascist goons will take any steps to properly protect anything (regardless of whether its the ideal system or not) and just let everything fall apart.

Considering all the damage just seems to be blatant wrecker shit trump is doing as β€œrevenge” for who knows what, probably having his pedo time taken away by the imperial core (and under his watch too) I think he wants this place to burn and cooking us all is his sick revenge fetish at this point.

Fucking prick

  • source
  • hideshow 46 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    The problem is that they kept propping things up and mitigating losses from those with wealth, i.e. protecting boomers.

    Recessions hurt, but they are historically a natural method of wealth redistribution. In a recession, people with stuff lose much more than the people without stuff, and then on the way back out the people without stuff now have a better chance to capture some of that wealth.

    Same for war. Historically speaking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Kind of reminds me of how our 100 year long strategy of putting out all forest fires as soon as the first spark erupts, has lead to large buildups of brush and growth, that under normal circumstances would have been burnt back, sparing the large trees and forest as A whole… but now provides so much fuel, that any fire now is not only an unstoppable force, it also kills any and every thing leaving the forests irrecoverable.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (43 children)

    The scary part of this one is that previously, we had administrations that, while still being right-of-center (yes ML, I know), had at least enough sense to prop things up well enough to recover.

    I'll admit I haven't cataloged all financial crises in American history, but I can't think of any right-of-center administrations that have cleaned up a things for a recovery. Perhaps only exception might be the Oil Crisis under Carter, and the recovery under Reagan. Great depression, Black Monday, Great Recession, COVID recession, all happened under right-of-center Presidents and recovered under left-of-center Presidents.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 43 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (42 children)

    You're misreading them, the DNC is at most right of center. The left begins at socialism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 42 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The left begins at socialism.

    If you're talking about the political spectrum I would think the extreme far left would begin at anarchism and eventually graduate to socialism as you move farther right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (39 children)

    What a stupid fucking thing to say. Socialism changes with nationality if you were half as capable as you delude yourself into thinking you are, the difference would be your catalyst.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 39 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (20 children)

    No he's right. There are no politicians with any real power in North America who are anywhere close to left. Dems are right and Reps are fascist. It's right and super-right in the US. Canada isn't doing any better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [+] -4 points 1 year ago (19 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (17 children)

    As I explained to you elsewhere:

    The only reason dicksucking is usable as a pejorative is to draw on historic sexism and homophobia, and telling someone to suck your dick draws on that social trauma. Telling someone to give you a haircut, for example, is still a service but doesn’t have that social trauma to make it a pejorative, and thus it doesn’t hit like one.

    It's basically drawing on SA to be used as an insult. If you don't think telling someone to suck your dick is drawing on historic bigotry towards groups that traditionally do that, then I'd like to know why you think it works as an insult.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago (13 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    I don't have personal experience with SA, nor am I homophobic. I'm pansexual myself. It isn't at all a false equivalence to say that there's a real difference in insult between telling someone to give you a haircut and telling someone to suck your dick. They are both services, but the latter draws stigma from historical sexism and homophobia. Using dicksucking as an insult affirms that history of bigotry, when in reality we should be fighting the negative stigma surrounding sexuality from women and gay men.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] -2 points 1 year ago (11 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    I don't think it's a good idea to mock SA. There's no ego involved, I haven't been a victim of SA, and it's incredibly rude to those who have been victims to treat it like an insult to be flung at people you don't like.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago* (9 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    I have never once tried to use SA against anyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -2 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [+] -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I have never used SA against you. I've said that telling users to suck your dick draws on the history of SA going back thousands of years in order to be hurtful as an insult (alongside misogny and homophobia), not that either of us has committed SA.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    .world How does this keep happening? Do they require proof of recent brain injuries to let people register only allow adult religious converts on that instance, or do they just only advertise on 4chan and Reddit?

    Edit: Sorry comrade. Genuinely. The coffee and covfefe induced hyperbole got me doing microaggressions out here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I agree with the sentiment, but I'd tone down the ableism.

    Lemmy.world is trying to replicate Reddit, though, in culture. It took off during the API thing, rather than a subreddit banning like r/TheDeprogram or r/Chapotraphouse, r/GenZedong, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (14 children)

    What do you mean by saying "socialism changes with nationality?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [+] -2 points 1 year ago* (13 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    How does socialism "change" by "nationality?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago (11 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (10 children)

    So it sounds like you're trying to say what people think socialism is changes from place to place. That's generally true for most political concepts, but that doesn't mean there isn't an actual consistent and correct definition. Even in the west, the idea that socialism is just social programs isn't an absolute, people are quite capable of understanding that it's when public ownership is the principle aspect of the economy and the working class is control.

    As for me, I am a Marxist-Leninist, sure. I don't see what you mean by saying I'm "not a socialist, at best I'm a Marxist." Marxism is historically the most significant branch of socialism, alongside anarchism, I don't see how Marxism could be considered not socialist. I also don't "defend dictators."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (8 children)

    I didn't confirm your assertion. I acknowledged that people are often mistaken, and this varies by location, and responded with the correct definition as has been most consistent historically and currently. Liberals believing socialism to merely be social programs isn't a "western" thing, it's a lack of education on what socialism actually is.

    And no, I never said "dumb shit," so there's nothing to admit to there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I'm open, I "reveal myself" to everyone. Rather, I don't hide anything. The impact of my choice of words is that people generally understand that capitalism is right wing, and socialism is left wing, ie private ownership as principle as right wing and public ownership as principle as left wing.

    Genuinely don't understand what you're trying to do or why.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago (5 children)