you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 34 points 1 year ago (42 children)

What is this AI everywhere concept actually supposed to accomplish for the end user? Maybe I'm just behind on the vision but I can't grasp the point. I have a feeling it's not really about what the users want but I'd love to here a genuinely good use case.

  • source
  • hideshow 42 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They've invested lots of money in AI systems and found out that people do not want to use them, so if they make them unavoidable and force people to use it.

    Capitalism does that sometimes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Like google plus.

    For me the Apple environment really cemented for me that consumers actively enjoy removing their own autonomy structurally, which is a big part of why this stuff has become so normalized.

    Putting a rootkit on their cds should have buried sony. Antitrust should be a thing too. The mickey mouse protection act should have socially killed Disney, which only found success by exploiting works that no longer held copyright. Etc.

    Those with power have lost all accountability, and all tools, especially AI, will be used against us if we do not cooperatively figure out how to fix the increasing power imbalance.

    The more power someone has, the harder the gavel should fall on them when they fuck the entire planet in whichever way.

    At this point, any new consumer friendly behaviour comes only to establish territory before hoarding and exploiting when enabled to do so.

    Amazon using deceptive design to influence general user behaviours should lead to billions and billions in fines until changed. Etc.

    Build local movements to cooperate at larger scale and fight back. If the general public is ranting about planned obsolescence and general monopolistic behaviours, maybe something could be affected before people are forced into violent desperation. People are too busy being mad at each other for some intentionally divisive narrative or another, and the general public just can't give a fuck about affecting the people who actually dictate the shape of society.

    Also if you burn down all AI this is still true. But it's easier to yell at technology than they system using it to further remove your autonomy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    it's like having 10 walmarts in one town. they are selling their investors infinite growth by showing a huge uptick in users through unavoidable systems being piled on. like how retail used to sell their investors on square footage going up every year by X amount. it gooses the stock and it doesn't matter than your losing money or destroying your business doing it, because the stocks going up RIGHT NOW is the only goal.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (38 children)

    It’s to make it easier for the end user to do what they want to. People are best at communicating by talking and writing, so having the ability to get things done using natural language is kinda the holy grail.

    Being able to summarise/edit/create documents/images/videos, automate tasks, change settings, etc by a simple conversation is an end user dream.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 38 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (35 children)

    How many misunderstandings happen because people are bad at both writing and talking?

    The answer is, a great deal.

    Your answer is nonsense.

    There is no real use case for the user. There are only use cases for the company.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 35 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (27 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (26 children)

    That's not a use case for users. That's a use case for a very specific sub group who likely weren't using the OS at all. Not saying it's not good they would be able to if that works for them, which I doubt.

    Its still not a reason to foist it onto all of us

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (24 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (23 children)

    For all else noone needs the shit baked into the OS.

    So you can't think of a single reason why anyone that's not disabled would want to use AI on a computer? No reason anyone would want to use ChatGPT? Generate an image? Re-write some text? Summarise some text or a video? None at all? Really?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (22 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (21 children)

    Being baked into the OS means it can do infinitely more than a browser based one can.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (20 children)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (19 children)

    Being baked into the OS means it can access parts of the OS. Asking ChatGPT in firefox to turn off HDR on your PC doesn't work. Using Copilot built in to the OS means it can.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (18 children)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (17 children)

    Oh so you do know the difference but you pretended you didn’t to try and act like there isn’t any?

    What “total surveillance” are you talking about? You have full control over your data with copilot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (16 children)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (15 children)

    You questioned why it exists while knowing the reason why it exists and pretending it doesn’t exist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (14 children)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (13 children)

    Same why no one (except maybe disabled people or totally technically clueless ones) would need an LLM to toggle HDR or adjust brightness/volume/whatever. ..... ok, bad example as i actually do that in a smart-home

    Having copilot built in to windows is basically "smart-home"-ing your computer. No one needs to ask home assistant to turn off their lights, but it damn sure is handy and most often faster than doing it manually - same with my example of turning HDR on/off.

    Having it built in means you could ask it to interact with every piece of your computer. If you can't see how there is no USE for this, you've got a very narrow mind and no ability to think outside the box.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (12 children)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (11 children)

    Do you think toggling hdr is the only thing copilot can do? Do you not understand examples?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (10 children)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (9 children)

    If you love being stuck in the dark ages and hating all innovation and new tech, go for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (8 children)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (7 children)

    So you understand how having integrations with different systems works, and the benefits it provides...........but can't understand that the same thing applies to AI built into an OS?

    Amazing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago* (5 children)

    I couldn’t think of one single scenario where this might be remotely handy.

    I literally gave you one - HDR toggling. You disregarded it because you didn't want there to be any reasons.

    Here's another - you could ask copilot to check your emails for an invite to a party that you are expecting, add the party to your calendar, create an item on your to-do list to get a present, and forward the invite to your partner.

    How's that? Is that not something that could be useful?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (3 children)

    Why should i toggle hdr off?

    Seriously? Because not everything supports HDR lol

    Takes a second to do with a mouse or keyboard

    If you know the keyboard shortcut, sure. With a mouse how do you do it in a second while you're in a game?

    As to the other example: Sure, useful.

    Great! So there we have it, you recognise that you were wrong. We got there in the end, hooray!

    To people who just don’t care about privacy

    How exactly do you think your privacy is being eroded? It's all on-device and you have privacy settings to control what MS can learn from.

    As MS should not have access to my mails, my calender or my to-do-list

    "MS" don't have to, just copilot on your device, without any feedback to MS.

    Try that shit with non-ms-products and it becomes just a waste of time.

    AI can already interact with third party products.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    SDR content looking bad when HDR is enabled, especially just the desktop and basic OS, has been a thing for years on windows. Guessing you either didn’t actually have a real HDR monitor, or just didn’t realise it shouldn’t look like what it did.

    Cloud-based use of AI doesn’t mean that they use your data for training or anything either - if you’d spent even 2 minutes looking at copilot in Windows you’d know this. On device or in cloud, you have privacy settings that control it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    That’s not a use case for users. That’s a use case for a very specific sub group who likely weren’t using the OS at all.

    Ok you're so far down the anti-AI hole that you're just being ridiculous. No point even bothering. "Disabled people don't use Windows" lol One of the dumbest hot takes I've heard in a while.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Your answer is nonsense.

    There is no real use case for the user.

    Showing your ignorance and short-sightedness right here. Just because you can't see uses, despite them being literally provided to you, doesn't mean there aren't any. It means that you can't think of them or understand them. That's a "you" problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    The fact AI has yet to do anything other than increase costs, increase the time taken to ship anything (particularly code), decrease trust and socialise the cost of data centres and electricity...

    I'd say it's an all of us problem and a fucking stupid problem to have.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    The fact AI has yet to do anything other than increase costs, increase the time taken to ship anything (particularly code), decrease trust and socialise the cost of data centres and electricity…

    This is just straight up lying though lol. All you're doing is showing your ignorance and complete lack of awareness of the world around you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Demonstrate a single false claim

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You really think that the current "AI" has not done a single good thing? You think that no one in the entire world has been able to benefit in any way, at all, from using AI?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    This is what people are currently doing right? people are not writing mails anymore, this just became too time consuming.

    At the same time this may be the limit of the current AI models. Me wanting to configure something on my computer that can be Googled and the AI does this for me on verbal prompt is kind of stupid but people are stupid.

    The real danger with this is total surveillance of your activity and possibly making you and your office job obsolete. At least they are attempting this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Me wanting to configure something on my computer that can be Googled and the AI does this for me on verbal prompt is kind of stupid

    How is that stupid? Isn't that the kind of things that everyone should want? "Hey copilot turn off HDR" is a lot easier than remembering the 4 or 5 button shortcut, or opening the settings menu and finding it, isn't it? Why would anyone think this is stupid?

    The real danger with this is total surveillance of your activity and possibly making you and your office job obsolete. At least they are attempting this.

    This isn't work related, and the enterprise versions of windows all have very strict controls over this stuff where microsoft do not ever get the data.

  • source
  • parent