you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Tell me you haven't read the bill without telling me you haven't read the bill.

It absolutely does not place restrictions on the use of personal property. It does the exact opposite.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    It's a whopping 6 pages and mostly double-spaced and more white space. And lemmy upvotes these cynical comments without a shred of investigation.

    I'm reading it as making data centers harder to block, now I'm not so sure. Your take?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)

    The bill explicitly states that data centers being a public nuisance is a "Compelling government interest," so I don't think it's geared towards protecting data centers.

    taking actions that prevent or abate common law nuisances created by physical datacenter infrastructure.

    Edit: there is one major issue with the bill; it still keeps the door open for age verification.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment