you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 11 months ago (8 children)

Firefox translation is AI. Should they remove that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago

    People don't want Firefox translation because they "want AI," though. They want it because being able to translate web pages is a useful feature. I think it's quite telling that nowhere in the linked article does the author actually defend Firefox's new "Window AI" feature as useful. Instead, the only argument he can make for it is that AI is popular.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    If it's less accurate than previously used methods of translations? Yes.

    If it consumes more resources than previously used methods of translations? Yes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    There were no previous methods of translation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    I've been using copy and paste to translation websites both before and after Firefox implemented translation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    Ok so pasting it into another AI. I dont get how this changes anything.

    The point is that people say they dont want AI features. But they really dont want chatbot features and are happy with AI being used for text prediction, translation, text to speech, speech to text, OCR and other useful features. Mozilla set themselves apart by adding these features on device and it was a much appreciated privacy step.

    They've failed a lot with ai like website building, summerization, tab grouping. But the do need to try otherwise thry wikl always be considered the old browser lacking modern features instead of the bleeding edge trailblazing browser they should be.

  • source
  • parent