you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (7 children)

    You'll have to explain how chatbots ran by the same company are fundamentally different. Because imo you're completely wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (5 children)

    Source? Also seems like anything over image is too much. Again, it's the same companies doing both, is it not?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (3 children)

    I notice you keep ignoring my one point. Is it not the same companies doing image generation as well as all the rest?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    No, it is. That's because Alphabet, Meta and every internet giant are pushing it to become mainstream, not because it's currently is. People who just Google something are in the billions, they use this crap daily several times a day, without any concerns about environmental impacts, all this while some enshitification of useful services is due to keep up with the AI losses. That's not desirable nor responsible.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    Oh come on. UNLESS VIDEO TAKES OFF???? I don't have social media, but fucks sake open your eyes to what is popular. It's taking off, there is no unless. And it absolutely is not beside the point, like the other guy said everytime I use google it fucking uses ai, every single google search.

  • source
  • parent