you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 9 months ago

Makes a lot of sense. GOG would have been an easy thing to sell off if financials weren’t going well. This way, GOG can be protected (100% owned by the founder with no shareholders) should the worst happen.

Hopefully this could mean GOG has a daring plan ahead (I’ve long thought they might take a gamble on a Linux client that packages Proton/DOSbox like Steam.

Here’s hoping GOG continues on strong into the new year and beyond!

  • source