all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9 points 9 months ago

So confused if this is a good thing, they seem to paint It as one, I'll need to look into Michal.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    Makes a lot of sense. GOG would have been an easy thing to sell off if financials weren’t going well. This way, GOG can be protected (100% owned by the founder with no shareholders) should the worst happen.

    Hopefully this could mean GOG has a daring plan ahead (I’ve long thought they might take a gamble on a Linux client that packages Proton/DOSbox like Steam.

    Here’s hoping GOG continues on strong into the new year and beyond!

  • source