TLDR: It reduces the virality of misinformation by ~8% and increases article deletion.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 9 months ago (12 children)
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (9 children)

    Are shits countable? Does it depend on if they're metaphorical or physical? 🤔

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago* (7 children)

    Fewer engagement is grammatically incorrect. Fewer shits is colloquially incorrect. If they want to be a pedant, they should at least know what the fuck they are talking about. If I were to try to improve it, I would change "less shits" to "less of a shit" but it's all slang anyway. Anyone suggesting such a correction is a wanker.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (3 children)

    Fewer shits is colloquially incorrect.

    Not in my area. Fewer shits is correct.

    If you want to use less, say "less of a shit".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)

    Used in a sentence:

    Fewer and fewer people cared for Prescriptivism, as they are aware that it's an outdated model of linguistics and that it's seen as a waste of everyone's time.

    Language is living and breathing, not frozen in amber

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment