▲ 541 ▼ Fact-checking reduces the circulation of misinformation – we should not get rid of it (cepr.org) submitted 9 months ago* by FactChecker@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world 47 comments fedilink hide all child comments TLDR: It reduces the virality of misinformation by ~8% and increases article deletion.
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago (12 children) Fewer permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] Meron35@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (9 children) Are shits countable? Does it depend on if they're metaphorical or physical? 🤔 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] BossDj@piefed.social 4 points 9 months ago (8 children) He meant fewer engagement permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] realitista@lemmus.org 7 points 9 months ago* (7 children) Fewer engagement is grammatically incorrect. Fewer shits is colloquially incorrect. If they want to be a pedant, they should at least know what the fuck they are talking about. If I were to try to improve it, I would change "less shits" to "less of a shit" but it's all slang anyway. Anyone suggesting such a correction is a wanker. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 9 months ago Looked at their profile, the funnier thing is that basically every post they make is grammatically incorrect permalink fedilink source parent [–] BossDj@piefed.social 2 points 9 months ago I know, I was joking. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Fewer shits is colloquially incorrect. Not in my area. Fewer shits is correct. If you want to use less, say "less of a shit". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] realitista@lemmus.org 1 point 9 months ago (2 children) Yes I think "less of a shit" is the right way (as I mentioned in the comment above). Where do you live? UK? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) I live on the Isle of Quibble. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] realitista@lemmus.org 1 point 9 months ago Ah that tracks permalink fedilink source parent [+] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child) Used in a sentence: Fewer and fewer people cared for Prescriptivism, as they are aware that it's an outdated model of linguistics and that it's seen as a waste of everyone's time. Language is living and breathing, not frozen in amber permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 1 point 9 months ago counter point: Stannis "the one true king" Baratheon permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (9 children) Are shits countable? Does it depend on if they're metaphorical or physical? 🤔 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] BossDj@piefed.social 4 points 9 months ago (8 children) He meant fewer engagement permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] realitista@lemmus.org 7 points 9 months ago* (7 children) Fewer engagement is grammatically incorrect. Fewer shits is colloquially incorrect. If they want to be a pedant, they should at least know what the fuck they are talking about. If I were to try to improve it, I would change "less shits" to "less of a shit" but it's all slang anyway. Anyone suggesting such a correction is a wanker. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 9 months ago Looked at their profile, the funnier thing is that basically every post they make is grammatically incorrect permalink fedilink source parent [–] BossDj@piefed.social 2 points 9 months ago I know, I was joking. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Fewer shits is colloquially incorrect. Not in my area. Fewer shits is correct. If you want to use less, say "less of a shit". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] realitista@lemmus.org 1 point 9 months ago (2 children) Yes I think "less of a shit" is the right way (as I mentioned in the comment above). Where do you live? UK? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) I live on the Isle of Quibble. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] realitista@lemmus.org 1 point 9 months ago Ah that tracks permalink fedilink source parent [+] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BossDj@piefed.social 4 points 9 months ago (8 children) He meant fewer engagement permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] realitista@lemmus.org 7 points 9 months ago* (7 children) Fewer engagement is grammatically incorrect. Fewer shits is colloquially incorrect. If they want to be a pedant, they should at least know what the fuck they are talking about. If I were to try to improve it, I would change "less shits" to "less of a shit" but it's all slang anyway. Anyone suggesting such a correction is a wanker. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 9 months ago Looked at their profile, the funnier thing is that basically every post they make is grammatically incorrect permalink fedilink source parent [–] BossDj@piefed.social 2 points 9 months ago I know, I was joking. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Fewer shits is colloquially incorrect. Not in my area. Fewer shits is correct. If you want to use less, say "less of a shit". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] realitista@lemmus.org 1 point 9 months ago (2 children) Yes I think "less of a shit" is the right way (as I mentioned in the comment above). Where do you live? UK? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) I live on the Isle of Quibble. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] realitista@lemmus.org 1 point 9 months ago Ah that tracks permalink fedilink source parent [+] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] realitista@lemmus.org 7 points 9 months ago* (7 children) Fewer engagement is grammatically incorrect. Fewer shits is colloquially incorrect. If they want to be a pedant, they should at least know what the fuck they are talking about. If I were to try to improve it, I would change "less shits" to "less of a shit" but it's all slang anyway. Anyone suggesting such a correction is a wanker. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 9 months ago Looked at their profile, the funnier thing is that basically every post they make is grammatically incorrect permalink fedilink source parent [–] BossDj@piefed.social 2 points 9 months ago I know, I was joking. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Fewer shits is colloquially incorrect. Not in my area. Fewer shits is correct. If you want to use less, say "less of a shit". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] realitista@lemmus.org 1 point 9 months ago (2 children) Yes I think "less of a shit" is the right way (as I mentioned in the comment above). Where do you live? UK? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) I live on the Isle of Quibble. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] realitista@lemmus.org 1 point 9 months ago Ah that tracks permalink fedilink source parent [+] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 9 months ago Looked at their profile, the funnier thing is that basically every post they make is grammatically incorrect permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BossDj@piefed.social 2 points 9 months ago I know, I was joking. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Fewer shits is colloquially incorrect. Not in my area. Fewer shits is correct. If you want to use less, say "less of a shit". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] realitista@lemmus.org 1 point 9 months ago (2 children) Yes I think "less of a shit" is the right way (as I mentioned in the comment above). Where do you live? UK? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) I live on the Isle of Quibble. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] realitista@lemmus.org 1 point 9 months ago Ah that tracks permalink fedilink source parent
[–] realitista@lemmus.org 1 point 9 months ago (2 children) Yes I think "less of a shit" is the right way (as I mentioned in the comment above). Where do you live? UK? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) I live on the Isle of Quibble. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] realitista@lemmus.org 1 point 9 months ago Ah that tracks permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) I live on the Isle of Quibble. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] realitista@lemmus.org 1 point 9 months ago Ah that tracks permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child) Used in a sentence: Fewer and fewer people cared for Prescriptivism, as they are aware that it's an outdated model of linguistics and that it's seen as a waste of everyone's time. Language is living and breathing, not frozen in amber permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 1 point 9 months ago counter point: Stannis "the one true king" Baratheon permalink fedilink source parent
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 1 point 9 months ago counter point: Stannis "the one true king" Baratheon permalink fedilink source parent