Attack the messenger, that only serves my point. You do not have sensible arguments explaining how the vast majority of researchers have consensus on the fact that Russia has no legitimate, good, reason to invade Ukraine in the view of someone concerned with human rights. By sensible, I mean not one that involves the theory that all researchers of the world are on a pay roll. Because you do not have such robust argument, you resort to ad hominem attacks that serve my point.
If you had some peer reviewed litterature confirming the genocidal thesis on Donbass, you would have provided it to me. But you haven't. It means that either it doesn't exist or that you do not have the necessary method to distinguish propaganda from fact. Or that you are a troll.
I have a method. Maybe it isn't right and maybe it is misleading. But I have an actual method to check the news. It is robust and hasn't failed me in the past. This method is rejecting the Donbass genocide story.