I'm asking cause my previous post regarding my server that isn't at home got moderated for violating rule 3. I don't get it ๐Ÿค”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 40 points 8 months ago (7 children)

Well, if you want to stir the pot, there are heavy discussions on both sides of the fence. Personally, I don't get all pedantic about it. To quote Ice Cube; 'Do your thing man, fuck what they looking at'.

As far as your post being deleted, it seems to be arbitrary at times and rather silent when courteous inquiries are made.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [โ€“] [S] 6 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    Well, I noticed my post got moderated when I wasn't able to reply to you, so here's my reply :

    The very first Linux server I ever stood up got whacked. I got a nastygram from my host that he had shut it down because of malicious activity against other servers. So, from their standpoint, I can understand why.

    Yes, but they should warn before shutting down, give you at least a few hours to speak for yourself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [โ€“] 9 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Yes, but they should warn before shutting down,

    IDK, if I were running the show, I'd probably have done the same thing especially when it started to involve other servers. I would assume that there would be some legal ramifications should it have just been ignored. It would have been good to observe to see if I could come up with who the puppeteer was, but I was super green then and probably wouldn't have known where to start as far as forensics. I mean, if you get hacked, the knee jerk reaction is to pull the plug, but it would be more productive to do some forensics before killing the server.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 4 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, I agree with 'nuke first ask questions later' when your compromised host is impacting other devices. If and only if i knew the attempts weren't going anywhere or doing anything would I consider unicing the vm/container to see what happened.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 1 point 8 months ago

    Now that I reflect on the embarrassment, it was a cheap, shared VPS and I'm pretty sure I was dogging the share. LOL Ahhhh....innocence. However, it was evident I needed some personal edification. Now, I am told, I over engineer security, but it works, so keep it the way it is.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] [S] 2 points 8 months ago

    At the very least, you could cut off Internet access and reduce vCores to 0.5, instead of completely shutting it down and only offering the user to book 4 hours of access during business hours as if they didn't have work too.

  • source
  • parent