you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 151 points 2 years ago (53 children)

Fucking FINALLY.

I've been waiting for a small pickup like the old 90s 4-banger Toyota. And this is electric, simple for function, and actually affordable?

Capitalists must be seething. If it doesnt have leather interior, 19 speaker surround sound, and cost 80k, get it out of our country! /s

  • source
  • hideshow 53 child comments
  • [–] 88 points 2 years ago (30 children)

    Small gas-powered trucks are effectively illegal in the US.

    It's regulation made in response to automakers calling everything a "light truck" to get around fuel economy and emissions standards in the 90s and 2000s.The straw that broke the camel's back was the PT Cruiser being classified as a truck by Chrysler.

    So, starting in model year 2012, vehicle fuel economy standards started being based on vehicle footprint. The side effect was that small, powerful vehicles designed for moving cargo more efficiently or in tighter spaces than large trucks were impacted. It's why 2011 was the last year model of the old Rangers, S10s, Dakota, etc.

    That's why the new Rangers are larger than the old F150s. They have to make them bigger to meet CAFE standards.

    Same issue hit the small cargo vans in 2021/22. As the CAFE standards went up, it became impossible to meet fuel economy standards for the NV200, Ford Transit Connect, and Ram ProMaster City compact cargo vans, so they were all discontinued.

    New York City was changing its whole Taxi fleet to NV200s due to their flexibility and accessibility options, and now can't buy new ones because a Toyota Camry has less-strict fuel economy requirements.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [+] 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (27 children)
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (23 children)

    A Maverick is a light truck in much the same way a 737 is a small plane. Sure there are bigger ones, but it's a 4 door truck with a 4 foot bed that's high enough to make loading and unloading harder than it needs to be. It's twice the weight and almost twice the size of a 70s/80s Toyota Pickup, which is a light truck.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (18 children)

    A Nissan Hardbody is one of the small trucks people keep complaining aren't made anymore.

    Dimensions of the 4 doors variant: length 5.1m, width 1.8m, height 1.7m

    Maverick dimensions (biggest model just to prove the point): length 5.1m, width 1.84m, height 1.76m

    It's the same thing with all trucks, compared to the equivalent model (i.e. not comparing a 2 doors with a crew cab like the anti truck crowd loves to do) modern trucks look much bigger but it's a design and height thing more than anything, their length and width hasn't increased that much, especially if you compare with cars of the same model over the same period (1985 Civic sedan vs 2025 Civic sedan for example).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (17 children)

    If you think a 2nd and 8th gen Toyota Hilux are the same dimensions it might be time to visit an optometrist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (16 children)

    I'm saying the difference isn't a big as what some people pretend when you're comparing the same versions.

    Short box regular cab vs long box crew cab, that's what people usually use as a comparison to prove their point even though it makes no sense to do so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    It does make sense, as regular cabs cannot be bought on new trucks. All of them are crew cabs, decreasing their utility and increasing their weight and size.

    As far as the general argument. Look at the headlight and start height of a Ford ranger in 2002 vs today.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (14 children)

    Nope, doesn't make sense at that's like saying cars got bigger because the Jetta is bigger than the Golf.

    As far as headlight height is concerned, again, design difference, total height isn't that different.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (13 children)

    The problem is you're arguing against what people have actually experienced, and in cases where they're in an area with persevered older vehicles on the road, can directly see.

    Rangers are now the size of old f150s, f150s are now larger than older f350s. Trucks are just bigger, period. All newer vehicles are just bigger and bulkier than older (90s-00s) vehicles.

    Its a massive safety issue, it's been studied in actual scientific journals, it is a fact you can't really deny at this point and it's weird you're trying to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (13 replies)
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Twice the size how? Like, crew cab versus single cab? Not sure that's a fair comparison

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I own two mavericks, it’s a fair comparison. They only look small because of the size of today’s vehicles… in the 1980’s you’d see most of today’s lifted trucks in a monster truck rally.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Oh yes, that part is obvious. I was more curious where "twice the size" came from, especially if comparing a four-door truck to a two-door single cab which I'd argue isn't a fair comparison. Although, they don't make the maverick in a single cab do they?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Light trucks, which means less CAFE regulation. Same classification as crossovers (why crossovers are so popular).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago*

    That's not accurate. "Light Truck" also includes a crew cab F150 with an extended bed that requires a Sherpa to enter. The Maverick and an F150 have the same standards, but weighted based on vehicle footprint.

    But the Maverick standard model is a hybrid, so it meets CAFE standards.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    That’s why the new Rangers are larger than the old F150s.

    If you're comparing a crewcab Ranger to a 2-door F150, sure, but that's not really a valid comparison.

    Comparing equivalent configs tells a different story: every crewcab F150 is taller, longer, and wider than a new crewcab Ranger. The 10th gen and earlier (pre-2004) F150s, which are shorter than 11th gen+ F150s, are still bigger when compared to the Ranger in equivalent configurations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 42 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Don't get too excited about seething capitalists. Bezos is a major investor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Article said it caught his interest, which to me means he took notice and will likely try to own it and enshitify it soon, not that he is currently behind it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago (14 children)

    Relatively affordable. It is 20k after the federal discounts and kick backs. Meanwhile, the Chinese EV market has been making cars as low as 4k. https://greenspeedx.com/cheap-electric-cars-available-in-china/

    I'm not a pro China person (because one time in Ark, a Chinese team kept destroying my thatch base), but they seem to have the things. Apparently Mexico is aiming to compete in the EV market as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    You might ask yourself what it is that allows them to produce and sell a brand new vehicle for $4k, basically the same price as a high-end PC or a couple of high-end smartphones.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    Mostly automation and sensible regulations. Also direct to consumer sales with third party dealerships not really existing for new cars. Also generally a lower cost of living allowing for lower wages and thus lower labor costs for the non automated parts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Why is it that China is the only country on the planet able to sell new vehicles for this cheap? Surely other countries have automation and sensible regulations too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    They genuinely aren't, Muerza in South Africa and a variety of other local brands across Africa and Asia have cheap cars.

    China cuts it down further by completely subsidizing education and opening vocational schools near factories that specialize in what those factory owners need, allowing hyper specialization. When you have an entire neighborhood able to produce all the parts of a car, instead of importing parts from across the world and assembling it like us car manufacturers do, you're able to massively cut costs.

    All manufacturing in china takes this approach of having almost enclaves of specialized knowledge and factories, and is genuinely an engineers wet dream to work in since you can get any part you could possibly want the same day, even if you just designed the part yesterday.

  • source
  • parent
  • Yeah, I'm pretty hype for this. It's got just the basics of what's needed, and if you want to mod it with upgrades you can.

    I only wish there was a way to make it AWD/4WD, and if there was a way for it to tow a little more weight, then it'd be perfect.

    As it is now, it's still a very compelling concept that I might get into as outside of towing, it solves all the things I need a truck for.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Capitalists must be seething

    Capitalists funded this, that's one the benefits of capitalism, if the market is only offering pricey crappy products that people don't enjoy buying, theres an opening in the market that can be filled with a company selling people exactly what they want and need.

  • source
  • parent