you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

That's a lot of "could" and "would" doing a lot of work while ultimately still in support of fascist bigoted bullshit.

All hypothetical shit when the actual, currently working concept of marriage already exists

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Now you lost me. Are you saying the current system of marriage works and at the same time insisting I'm the one against same sex marriage?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    Yes to both. Your original suggestion is to strip me and my husband of our marriage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    No, I'm trying to get your family recognized nationwide by using a different term to remove the barrier to rights and privileges. I'm separating church and state. I'm suggesting the freedom to get "married" by whatever religion accepts people for who they are. I'm saying the government should recognize when two people decide to contribute to society as one.

    You can do both is my point. Get a certificate of union from the government (establish rights) and then go get married by whomever you want. Again problem solved.

  • source
  • parent