you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 6 months ago (5 children)

Having a lot of guns doesn't mean shit when you can only use one gun at a time.

If 25 people are fighting 33 people, but that 25 people have 75 guns and the 33 people have 33 guns, it's still an equitable fight.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (4 children)

    The stats are on number of owners, not guns owned

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (3 children)

    My point is that people horde guns.

    If you have 1 person who owns 25 guns and another who owns one. They are equal. Also, during an actual war, this would literally be a moot point as the state would be arming people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (2 children)

    Not really. The guy with 25 guns can arm 24 friends. The state would hardly be arming people, the military would be directly involved on one side or the other. A civil war between left and right would absolutely not work out well for the left.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    24 friends who don't want to fight?

    You don't think the liberal states wouldn't arm their on fighting groups if open civil war happened? Cmon now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago*

    You’re making a baseless assumption that the 24 friends wouldn’t want to fight. Doesn’t own a gun yet doesn’t mean won’t join the fight. Liberal states won’t arm citizens, that’s inconsistent with their core principles. Besides that, they’d end up arming conservatives too because we’d just fake being liberal to get a free gun. Already take advantage of liberal gun buy”back” programs by forcing you idiots to buy pipeguns and shitty broken guns to fund our ammo budget 😂

  • source
  • parent