you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 6 months ago (6 children)

Your two examples didn’t explain what “forced inclusion” means and what makes it different from regular inclusion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    "Nuh uh" isn't an argument. If you won't read the comment then I won't be able to give you a meaningful reply.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Your examples provided made no mention of "forced inclusion" or what makes it different from regular inclusion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    I clearly explained the distinction despite not using the term "forced inclusion," which I didn't raise. You did. I can't reply qualitatively unless you explain which part confuses you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    ...this you?

    What does “forced inclusion” mean? What makes it different from regular inclusion?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago* (1 child)

    Yes, in response to this comment.

    Agreed. People should dislike modern Star Trek for it’s bad writing, not because it’s progressive.

    I didn't raise the topic. I replied to it. I presume you can see that comment? Are you using an application which truncates the discussion? If you disagree with something, feel free to tell me what :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment