this post was submitted on 05 May 2026
716 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

20142 readers
2380 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

ok i can see the steam turbine powering onboard electrical but explain me how the fuck you're doing space propulsion and/or warp travel with steam

unless you mean literally just blasting steam like a propellant, Wall-E With the Fire Extinguisher style. in which case you're gonna run outta steam pretty fast

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Ion thrusters are an example of electricity used for space propulsion.

In ion thrusters electricity is used to create a magnetic field that accelerate the propellant particles at very high speed. This way the propellant of used much more efficiently.

Edit: I forgot to mention that it's not a concept, it's actively used in a lot of satellites

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago

ooooooh

well that's pretty neat.

[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So skimming through the wiki article, it sounds like it it's still "throw something out the back" to generate thrust, which is largely the same problem as the Wall-E with a fire extinguisher problem another commenter made.

Ion Thrusters sound significantly more efficient (in terms of velocity change vs fuel), but do I have the right idea on that?

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

Yes, ion thrusters still use conservation of momentum to generate thrust. They aren't limited by how fast or how hot we can make something explode though, so we can shove way more energy into the stuff they're throwing out the back. They're basically tiny coil/railguns, using electricity to move individual ions really fast.

In terms of efficiency, Ion thrusters are 4 to 40 times better than liquid fueled rockets. The draw back is that ion engines make very little thrust for the mass of the engine.

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yes, just like every new electrical generation method is steam, every new method of propulsion in space is throw something at the back as fast as we can.

The exception being Project Orion. The idea behind project Orion is to constantly drop and explode nuclear bombs behind the spaceship at a rate of 1 bomb per second. The explosion of the bomb would then push the spaceship forward.

[–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

At some point in the future, it will be trivial to fold spacetime and tunnel through, which needs electricity to charge capacitors and shit because the fuel is energy. You think space travel will be done with gasoline engines?

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I sure hope not, the USA has already done enough damage for terrestrial use gasoline 💀

[–] one5low7@lemmy.org 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

space ships in the future will photosynthesize, that will createa steady supply of breatheable air

[–] one5low7@lemmy.org 1 points 3 days ago

even submarines are runing nuclear reactors