▲ 1358 ▼ GrapheneOS says Google is making life harder for rival operating systems and devices (www.androidauthority.com) submitted 4 months ago by throws_lemy@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 178 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 months ago (6 children) Graphene OS need to develop their own app store. permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 4 months ago (4 children) They do have their own App Store, it’s just only got like… 14 apps in it. Mostly just the stuff they’ve made them selves that they’re super confident in the security of, as well as a couple of other app stores like Accrescent To start allowing submissions of any third party app to it would ether require them to do a ton of vetting to ensure it meets their standards, or for them to drop the standards for security and privacy for it. If you want more than that handful of defaults, Accrescent and the google play mirror are there ready to be installed permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago (3 children) They need to start incentivizing developers to develop for their app store. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] qaz@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago Why not just use F-Droid? permalink fedilink source parent [–] ___@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 months ago (1 child) You need a lot of money for incentives. The bigger factor is large scale adoption among the corporate apps that others use (their privacy policies notwithstanding), which I realistically see never happening for Graphene, sadly. Sideloading is a decent alternative, I just don't know how long it'll be around for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago Sideloading only needs to be supported by the OS, and the developer. (am I wrong here?) permalink fedilink source parent [–] maya_the_good_apple@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago They already have one. Maybe they could partner with F-droid... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 4 months ago (4 children) They do have their own App Store, it’s just only got like… 14 apps in it. Mostly just the stuff they’ve made them selves that they’re super confident in the security of, as well as a couple of other app stores like Accrescent To start allowing submissions of any third party app to it would ether require them to do a ton of vetting to ensure it meets their standards, or for them to drop the standards for security and privacy for it. If you want more than that handful of defaults, Accrescent and the google play mirror are there ready to be installed permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago (3 children) They need to start incentivizing developers to develop for their app store. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] qaz@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago Why not just use F-Droid? permalink fedilink source parent [–] ___@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 months ago (1 child) You need a lot of money for incentives. The bigger factor is large scale adoption among the corporate apps that others use (their privacy policies notwithstanding), which I realistically see never happening for Graphene, sadly. Sideloading is a decent alternative, I just don't know how long it'll be around for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago Sideloading only needs to be supported by the OS, and the developer. (am I wrong here?) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago (3 children) They need to start incentivizing developers to develop for their app store. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] qaz@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago Why not just use F-Droid? permalink fedilink source parent [–] ___@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 months ago (1 child) You need a lot of money for incentives. The bigger factor is large scale adoption among the corporate apps that others use (their privacy policies notwithstanding), which I realistically see never happening for Graphene, sadly. Sideloading is a decent alternative, I just don't know how long it'll be around for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago Sideloading only needs to be supported by the OS, and the developer. (am I wrong here?) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ___@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 months ago (1 child) You need a lot of money for incentives. The bigger factor is large scale adoption among the corporate apps that others use (their privacy policies notwithstanding), which I realistically see never happening for Graphene, sadly. Sideloading is a decent alternative, I just don't know how long it'll be around for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago Sideloading only needs to be supported by the OS, and the developer. (am I wrong here?) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago Sideloading only needs to be supported by the OS, and the developer. (am I wrong here?) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] maya_the_good_apple@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago They already have one. Maybe they could partner with F-droid... permalink fedilink source parent