▲ 17 ▼ Parents take TikTok to court over claims it hooks teenagers (www.euronews.com) submitted 4 months ago by madeindex@lemmy.world to c/europe@lemmy.ml 11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] -3 points 4 months ago* (4 children) Solid lists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TikTok#Controversies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_by_TikTok permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago (3 children) LOL Will take a look just for fun later knowing what a biased source Shitipedia is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago As I figured, a circlejerk of western mouthpiece sources pointing at each other and based on nothing but vague and ridiculous accusations. permalink fedilink source parent [–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] 0 points 4 months ago (1 child) It's a decent collection, you can just directly go to the listed sources if you like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago I tried many of them and as I said, they don't deliver proof. And what may be valid is nothing meaningfully different than the western ones. If anything they are worse. It's obvious simply an excuse to censor news. Protect the children, terrorism, possible espionage... The typical excuses to disadvantage competitors. While being complete hypocrites at that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago (3 children) LOL Will take a look just for fun later knowing what a biased source Shitipedia is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago As I figured, a circlejerk of western mouthpiece sources pointing at each other and based on nothing but vague and ridiculous accusations. permalink fedilink source parent [–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] 0 points 4 months ago (1 child) It's a decent collection, you can just directly go to the listed sources if you like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago I tried many of them and as I said, they don't deliver proof. And what may be valid is nothing meaningfully different than the western ones. If anything they are worse. It's obvious simply an excuse to censor news. Protect the children, terrorism, possible espionage... The typical excuses to disadvantage competitors. While being complete hypocrites at that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago As I figured, a circlejerk of western mouthpiece sources pointing at each other and based on nothing but vague and ridiculous accusations. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] 0 points 4 months ago (1 child) It's a decent collection, you can just directly go to the listed sources if you like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago I tried many of them and as I said, they don't deliver proof. And what may be valid is nothing meaningfully different than the western ones. If anything they are worse. It's obvious simply an excuse to censor news. Protect the children, terrorism, possible espionage... The typical excuses to disadvantage competitors. While being complete hypocrites at that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago I tried many of them and as I said, they don't deliver proof. And what may be valid is nothing meaningfully different than the western ones. If anything they are worse. It's obvious simply an excuse to censor news. Protect the children, terrorism, possible espionage... The typical excuses to disadvantage competitors. While being complete hypocrites at that. permalink fedilink source parent