▲ 17 ▼ Parents take TikTok to court over claims it hooks teenagers (www.euronews.com) submitted 4 months ago by madeindex@lemmy.world to c/europe@lemmy.ml 11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (13 children) What a coincidence. After the USSA the fascist EU finds another excuse to control all the media. permalink fedilink source hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] -1 points 4 months ago (12 children) While it is being abused as an excuse to create an authoritarian, dystopian internet, the lawsuit itself is correct, it's an evil corp, no doubt. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (11 children) And do you have anything to prove your opinion? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (8 children) We're talking about TikTok in Europe (Chinese), not the USSA controlled one. The only big uncensored source of news on Palestine. And the EU fascists want to ban that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children) you were broadly asking for proof of their closing of the internet I was not. I asked for proof of them being an 'evil corp' ,as OP claimed, to justify their attack on TikTok. Which of course he failed yo deliver. That the EU fascist would do that to censor antizionism and criticism is more than 'within the realm of possibility'. This is exactly what happened in the USSA where the ADL and zionists like the ghoul Clinton have pushed for it hard since they started their genocide. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] -3 points 4 months ago* (4 children) Solid lists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TikTok#Controversies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_by_TikTok permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago (3 children) LOL Will take a look just for fun later knowing what a biased source Shitipedia is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago As I figured, a circlejerk of western mouthpiece sources pointing at each other and based on nothing but vague and ridiculous accusations. permalink fedilink source parent [–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] 0 points 4 months ago (1 child) It's a decent collection, you can just directly go to the listed sources if you like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago I tried many of them and as I said, they don't deliver proof. And what may be valid is nothing meaningfully different than the western ones. If anything they are worse. It's obvious simply an excuse to censor news. Protect the children, terrorism, possible espionage... The typical excuses to disadvantage competitors. While being complete hypocrites at that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] -1 points 4 months ago Solid lists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TikTok#Controversies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_by_TikTok permalink fedilink source parent
[–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] -1 points 4 months ago (12 children) While it is being abused as an excuse to create an authoritarian, dystopian internet, the lawsuit itself is correct, it's an evil corp, no doubt. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (11 children) And do you have anything to prove your opinion? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (8 children) We're talking about TikTok in Europe (Chinese), not the USSA controlled one. The only big uncensored source of news on Palestine. And the EU fascists want to ban that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children) you were broadly asking for proof of their closing of the internet I was not. I asked for proof of them being an 'evil corp' ,as OP claimed, to justify their attack on TikTok. Which of course he failed yo deliver. That the EU fascist would do that to censor antizionism and criticism is more than 'within the realm of possibility'. This is exactly what happened in the USSA where the ADL and zionists like the ghoul Clinton have pushed for it hard since they started their genocide. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] -3 points 4 months ago* (4 children) Solid lists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TikTok#Controversies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_by_TikTok permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago (3 children) LOL Will take a look just for fun later knowing what a biased source Shitipedia is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago As I figured, a circlejerk of western mouthpiece sources pointing at each other and based on nothing but vague and ridiculous accusations. permalink fedilink source parent [–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] 0 points 4 months ago (1 child) It's a decent collection, you can just directly go to the listed sources if you like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago I tried many of them and as I said, they don't deliver proof. And what may be valid is nothing meaningfully different than the western ones. If anything they are worse. It's obvious simply an excuse to censor news. Protect the children, terrorism, possible espionage... The typical excuses to disadvantage competitors. While being complete hypocrites at that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] -1 points 4 months ago Solid lists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TikTok#Controversies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_by_TikTok permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (11 children) And do you have anything to prove your opinion? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (8 children) We're talking about TikTok in Europe (Chinese), not the USSA controlled one. The only big uncensored source of news on Palestine. And the EU fascists want to ban that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children) you were broadly asking for proof of their closing of the internet I was not. I asked for proof of them being an 'evil corp' ,as OP claimed, to justify their attack on TikTok. Which of course he failed yo deliver. That the EU fascist would do that to censor antizionism and criticism is more than 'within the realm of possibility'. This is exactly what happened in the USSA where the ADL and zionists like the ghoul Clinton have pushed for it hard since they started their genocide. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] -3 points 4 months ago* (4 children) Solid lists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TikTok#Controversies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_by_TikTok permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago (3 children) LOL Will take a look just for fun later knowing what a biased source Shitipedia is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago As I figured, a circlejerk of western mouthpiece sources pointing at each other and based on nothing but vague and ridiculous accusations. permalink fedilink source parent [–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] 0 points 4 months ago (1 child) It's a decent collection, you can just directly go to the listed sources if you like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago I tried many of them and as I said, they don't deliver proof. And what may be valid is nothing meaningfully different than the western ones. If anything they are worse. It's obvious simply an excuse to censor news. Protect the children, terrorism, possible espionage... The typical excuses to disadvantage competitors. While being complete hypocrites at that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] -1 points 4 months ago Solid lists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TikTok#Controversies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_by_TikTok permalink fedilink source parent
[+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (8 children) We're talking about TikTok in Europe (Chinese), not the USSA controlled one. The only big uncensored source of news on Palestine. And the EU fascists want to ban that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children) you were broadly asking for proof of their closing of the internet I was not. I asked for proof of them being an 'evil corp' ,as OP claimed, to justify their attack on TikTok. Which of course he failed yo deliver. That the EU fascist would do that to censor antizionism and criticism is more than 'within the realm of possibility'. This is exactly what happened in the USSA where the ADL and zionists like the ghoul Clinton have pushed for it hard since they started their genocide. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] -3 points 4 months ago* (4 children) Solid lists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TikTok#Controversies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_by_TikTok permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago (3 children) LOL Will take a look just for fun later knowing what a biased source Shitipedia is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago As I figured, a circlejerk of western mouthpiece sources pointing at each other and based on nothing but vague and ridiculous accusations. permalink fedilink source parent [–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] 0 points 4 months ago (1 child) It's a decent collection, you can just directly go to the listed sources if you like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago I tried many of them and as I said, they don't deliver proof. And what may be valid is nothing meaningfully different than the western ones. If anything they are worse. It's obvious simply an excuse to censor news. Protect the children, terrorism, possible espionage... The typical excuses to disadvantage competitors. While being complete hypocrites at that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (8 children) We're talking about TikTok in Europe (Chinese), not the USSA controlled one. The only big uncensored source of news on Palestine. And the EU fascists want to ban that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children) you were broadly asking for proof of their closing of the internet I was not. I asked for proof of them being an 'evil corp' ,as OP claimed, to justify their attack on TikTok. Which of course he failed yo deliver. That the EU fascist would do that to censor antizionism and criticism is more than 'within the realm of possibility'. This is exactly what happened in the USSA where the ADL and zionists like the ghoul Clinton have pushed for it hard since they started their genocide. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] -3 points 4 months ago* (4 children) Solid lists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TikTok#Controversies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_by_TikTok permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago (3 children) LOL Will take a look just for fun later knowing what a biased source Shitipedia is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago As I figured, a circlejerk of western mouthpiece sources pointing at each other and based on nothing but vague and ridiculous accusations. permalink fedilink source parent [–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] 0 points 4 months ago (1 child) It's a decent collection, you can just directly go to the listed sources if you like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago I tried many of them and as I said, they don't deliver proof. And what may be valid is nothing meaningfully different than the western ones. If anything they are worse. It's obvious simply an excuse to censor news. Protect the children, terrorism, possible espionage... The typical excuses to disadvantage competitors. While being complete hypocrites at that. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children) you were broadly asking for proof of their closing of the internet I was not. I asked for proof of them being an 'evil corp' ,as OP claimed, to justify their attack on TikTok. Which of course he failed yo deliver. That the EU fascist would do that to censor antizionism and criticism is more than 'within the realm of possibility'. This is exactly what happened in the USSA where the ADL and zionists like the ghoul Clinton have pushed for it hard since they started their genocide. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] -3 points 4 months ago* (4 children) Solid lists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TikTok#Controversies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_by_TikTok permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago (3 children) LOL Will take a look just for fun later knowing what a biased source Shitipedia is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago As I figured, a circlejerk of western mouthpiece sources pointing at each other and based on nothing but vague and ridiculous accusations. permalink fedilink source parent [–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] 0 points 4 months ago (1 child) It's a decent collection, you can just directly go to the listed sources if you like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago I tried many of them and as I said, they don't deliver proof. And what may be valid is nothing meaningfully different than the western ones. If anything they are worse. It's obvious simply an excuse to censor news. Protect the children, terrorism, possible espionage... The typical excuses to disadvantage competitors. While being complete hypocrites at that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children) you were broadly asking for proof of their closing of the internet I was not. I asked for proof of them being an 'evil corp' ,as OP claimed, to justify their attack on TikTok. Which of course he failed yo deliver. That the EU fascist would do that to censor antizionism and criticism is more than 'within the realm of possibility'. This is exactly what happened in the USSA where the ADL and zionists like the ghoul Clinton have pushed for it hard since they started their genocide. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] -3 points 4 months ago* (4 children) Solid lists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TikTok#Controversies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_by_TikTok permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago (3 children) LOL Will take a look just for fun later knowing what a biased source Shitipedia is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago As I figured, a circlejerk of western mouthpiece sources pointing at each other and based on nothing but vague and ridiculous accusations. permalink fedilink source parent [–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] 0 points 4 months ago (1 child) It's a decent collection, you can just directly go to the listed sources if you like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago I tried many of them and as I said, they don't deliver proof. And what may be valid is nothing meaningfully different than the western ones. If anything they are worse. It's obvious simply an excuse to censor news. Protect the children, terrorism, possible espionage... The typical excuses to disadvantage competitors. While being complete hypocrites at that. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] -3 points 4 months ago* (4 children) Solid lists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TikTok#Controversies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_by_TikTok permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago (3 children) LOL Will take a look just for fun later knowing what a biased source Shitipedia is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago As I figured, a circlejerk of western mouthpiece sources pointing at each other and based on nothing but vague and ridiculous accusations. permalink fedilink source parent [–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] 0 points 4 months ago (1 child) It's a decent collection, you can just directly go to the listed sources if you like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago I tried many of them and as I said, they don't deliver proof. And what may be valid is nothing meaningfully different than the western ones. If anything they are worse. It's obvious simply an excuse to censor news. Protect the children, terrorism, possible espionage... The typical excuses to disadvantage competitors. While being complete hypocrites at that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago (3 children) LOL Will take a look just for fun later knowing what a biased source Shitipedia is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago As I figured, a circlejerk of western mouthpiece sources pointing at each other and based on nothing but vague and ridiculous accusations. permalink fedilink source parent [–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] 0 points 4 months ago (1 child) It's a decent collection, you can just directly go to the listed sources if you like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago I tried many of them and as I said, they don't deliver proof. And what may be valid is nothing meaningfully different than the western ones. If anything they are worse. It's obvious simply an excuse to censor news. Protect the children, terrorism, possible espionage... The typical excuses to disadvantage competitors. While being complete hypocrites at that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago As I figured, a circlejerk of western mouthpiece sources pointing at each other and based on nothing but vague and ridiculous accusations. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] 0 points 4 months ago (1 child) It's a decent collection, you can just directly go to the listed sources if you like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago I tried many of them and as I said, they don't deliver proof. And what may be valid is nothing meaningfully different than the western ones. If anything they are worse. It's obvious simply an excuse to censor news. Protect the children, terrorism, possible espionage... The typical excuses to disadvantage competitors. While being complete hypocrites at that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago I tried many of them and as I said, they don't deliver proof. And what may be valid is nothing meaningfully different than the western ones. If anything they are worse. It's obvious simply an excuse to censor news. Protect the children, terrorism, possible espionage... The typical excuses to disadvantage competitors. While being complete hypocrites at that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] madeindex@lemmy.world [S] -1 points 4 months ago Solid lists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TikTok#Controversies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_by_TikTok permalink fedilink source parent
all 14 comments