I believe the sensationalism is her brand mostly for the clickbait. She needs the views and interactions. But it's also, to some extent, her exclusively liberal analysis. And yeah, the conspiracy theory thing is real. She usually flirts with that. For example, the AI data center for biometrics below the new ballroom in the White House might be true, I'll give her that, but the angle on COVID being a bioweapon will always sound like kookery to me. Specially if she can't produce evidence from any of the agencies she does say are involved. And that's what gets me: she jumps to a conclusion when some stuff are just simpler, or even, better explained by "yeah, that's capitalism for you".
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments