you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 33 points 4 months ago (10 children)

They're unprofitable. This is just socializing losses

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Profit isn't the goal with nationalized sectors in fairness; nor should one want that (obvious example being single payer universal Healthcare). The question is whether or not these systems can be regulated and in the public eye, if they have a benefit to society. Which realistically, the genie is never going back in the bottle on this. Much like the internet itself, pros and cons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Shareholders don't pay out of pocket for losses

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (4 children)
    1. AI companies at present are all privately held. There are no shareholders
    2. My point is that this move lets these reckless and wasteful companies off the hook for their behavior
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (3 children)

    Read the OP... It's effectively talking about making everyone a shareholder

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    OK how does my point get negated?

    AI will never be profitable. It costs too much. This will just socialize all the losses

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments