▲ 181 ▼ My $1 bill has no repeating decimals in its serial number (europe.pub) submitted 4 months ago by Zonefive@sh.itjust.works to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world 47 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago (4 children) Someone figure out the probability! permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] BeanGoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 4 months ago (3 children) If I remember high school math correctly, The first digit can be anything so, 10/10 options, the second digit cant be be the first so only 9/10 options, then 8/10 for the third, continue this pattern for each digit and multiply together you get 1.8% chance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 5 points 4 months ago (2 children) 10 x 9 x 8... etc. yields 1,814,400 possible combinations of no repeats, right? I'm confused what the "whole" is if this is expressed as a percent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 months ago (1 child) 100 000 000, the number of possible serial numbers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 4 points 4 months ago Aha, that makes sense. Thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BeanGoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 4 months ago (3 children) If I remember high school math correctly, The first digit can be anything so, 10/10 options, the second digit cant be be the first so only 9/10 options, then 8/10 for the third, continue this pattern for each digit and multiply together you get 1.8% chance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 5 points 4 months ago (2 children) 10 x 9 x 8... etc. yields 1,814,400 possible combinations of no repeats, right? I'm confused what the "whole" is if this is expressed as a percent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 months ago (1 child) 100 000 000, the number of possible serial numbers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 4 points 4 months ago Aha, that makes sense. Thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 5 points 4 months ago (2 children) 10 x 9 x 8... etc. yields 1,814,400 possible combinations of no repeats, right? I'm confused what the "whole" is if this is expressed as a percent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 months ago (1 child) 100 000 000, the number of possible serial numbers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 4 points 4 months ago Aha, that makes sense. Thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 months ago (1 child) 100 000 000, the number of possible serial numbers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 4 points 4 months ago Aha, that makes sense. Thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 4 points 4 months ago Aha, that makes sense. Thanks. permalink fedilink source parent