Fuck AI

7553 readers

1011 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

VerbFlow@lemmy.world

MrMcGasion@lemmy.world

TootSweet@lemmy.world

BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world

cynar@lemmy.world

drmeanfeel@lemmy.world

pavnilschanda@lemmy.world

CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world

WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world

Communist@lemmy.ml

eatCasserole@lemmy.world

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world

NutWrench@lemmy.world

Soup@lemmy.cafe

iAvicenna@lemmy.world

Tinks@lemmy.world

wizblizz@lemmy.world

corus_kt@lemmy.world

Prandom_returns@lemm.ee

TrickDacy@lemmy.world

TheFriar@lemm.ee

HawlSera@lemm.ee

andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works

MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works

33550336@lemmy.world

Nougat@fedia.io

Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world

Quill7513@slrpnk.net

glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz

e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de

ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social

679

Wikipedia isn't a valid source (europe.pub)

submitted 2 days ago by thal3s@sh.itjust.works to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

36 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(TikTok screencap)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CelestialBunny@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

I don't know. This just seems like the logical next step from "just Google it." I'm under the impression that search results were tailored for the user and even if they weren't most of the time Google just seemed like a tool for confirmation bias, not education.

That said, Wikipedia isn't a valid source due to the fact that it can be subject to change in ways that can make it difficult to check later. That saaaaaid, Wikipedia has sources you can potentially investigate and cite soooo... I mean... Just saying.