686
Bane Mask (europe.pub)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by to c/linkedinlunatics@sh.itjust.works
255 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Sure but he was also investing when the stock market was also slightly attached to reality which hasn't been true in a decade at least.

It was always gambling but now numbers must go up at all costs

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    That has always been the case and is written into law that a publicly traded company must do anything possible to make more money.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    It's not actually law and that's just what companies want to be the belief for them behaving reprehensibly

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Yes, I believe you're interpreting that page incorrectly. Fiduciary duties are law bindings for specific relationships and situations not applicable for all publicly traded companies to all shareholders.

    I believe you're confusing that idea with the theory of shareholder supremacy that's a claim, popularized by the likes of Jack Welch to support their actions.

    The background comes from Dodge v. Ford Motor Co. in 1919 which stated

    There should be no confusion... A business corporation is organized and carried on primarily for the profit of the stockholders.

    and the interpretation has been quite debated.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent