you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 2 months ago (14 children)

I'm kind of surprised that Apple didn't name the iPhone just "Phone".

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (13 children)

    Probably not enough to get recognised as a brand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (12 children)

    Common dictionary words are not trademarkable. In fact, if an existing trademark becomes common in speech it becomes genericized and the trademark is lost. One of my personal hobbies is doing that to Velcro.

    That, and you've got to remember how big iPods were at the time. In 2007, it was weird that Apple was entering the cell phone market. The iSomething branding basically saved the company in 2001 with the iMac and iBook, the iPod was the first electronics gadget I ever remember being worn as a status symbol, the first that got treated like designer clothing or shoes. That "I have an iPod, and you have...whatever that is." White headphone cords were a fashion statement. The Motorola Razr phone got the same treatment before the iPhone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    That's a brand??? Then what's the actual thing called?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah most space age material names are. It's dacron wrapped in mylar surmounted in inconel plated in clyno and attached with velcro. Which of those did I make up?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    I know that Mylar, Inconel and Velcro are real, so it's a toss-up between Dacron and Clyno.

    After consulting an online source, I vote that Clyno is the imposter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    I have only heard some old-fashioned sailors and marketing people call it Dacron, everybody else has settled on polyester

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Physical products - maybe, but it doesn't seem to apply to software. And Apple is not the only offender in that (although I have to admit that they're somewhat good at coming up with generic and yet recognisable names because of the context). Just try to think of a desktop or mobile OS that doesn't bundle a default app with a generic name like Files, Mail, Internet and so on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    They're not trying to trademark those. Others can call their default apps the same thing and it's fine. Others can't call their default in house browser chrome (unless they're google).

  • source
  • parent