Sure, all articles should be read with skepticism.

It’s not a huge logical leap to go from identifying faces in photos at some confidence level to identifying some diseases in imaging at some confidence level. Your first link mostly talks about the human factor and specifically states that with bad ai models, the radiologist is less effective but with good ai models, the radiologist is more effective which suggests the technology works. That link isn’t commenting on the technology, it’s commenting on the human using it.

Same source claiming the tech does work: Source1 Source2

Your last link is talking about people being able to forge medical documents. To be honest, I don’t get the point you’re trying to make. I agree that, like with most technologies, people can use AI nefariously. However, generating a photo with AI to forge a medical document and using AI as an assistive tool to scan medical imaging for diseases are two different applications.

Those articles you’re reading are written from the press releases of for-profit companies

Sorry FBI, you’ve hacked into the wrong mainframe