this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
423 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

86816 readers
3842 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pasdechance@jlai.lu 56 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I think this is a tough one to weigh in on depending where you come from. If I lived somewhere where the news talked about school shootings a lot, I might want my child to have a phone.

Go after the companies making addictive applications instead.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

It's not that hard. You keep it in your backpack, and never take it out the whole day while school is in session.

[–] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

When I was a kid in school, you had to go to the office to use the phone.

[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 10 points 1 day ago

My school at least still had a payphone near the cafeteria we only got rid of in 2011.

[–] Polisheocket@lemmy.zip 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Same, and I feel like that should be the only phone available. Us older millennials didn’t have phones, these kids don’t need them either during school. Now I’m not against them used at lunch time or breaks, that’s there time

[–] mobyduck648@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair there was infrastructure then that doesn’t exist now. Most phone boxes are basically just public urinals now for example, I mean they always were but you could usually expect a phone to be in there too. People were also used to remembering numbers, but the only numbers I remember these days are my own and various landlines from my childhood which have been disconnected for over a decade as people did away with traditional landlines, then the VoIP bridge replacements which just became a way to receive international tech support scam calls more efficiently.

I personally want to see smartphones curtailed more generally; if I had absolutist power a lot of the adtech sector (at least surveillance-based behavioural recommendation algorithms) would be legislated out of existence on public health and democratic integrity grounds for example. I’d like to see e-ink smartphones become a wider market segment too, as these inherently break a lot of ‘dark patterns’ and also make short form video content less viable in favour of text content. I don’t think we can just take smartphones off kids and dump them at eighteen into the psychological manipulation engine that is the modern adtech sector without wider structural reforms to our relationship with smartphones and the internet.

[–] BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk 2 points 14 hours ago

I honestly think it would do a lot if all sorting algorithms were made open source.

We would quite quickly have mapped out how their algorithms work and which companies are the most predatory

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just make them leave it off. Anyone caught using a phone gets it taken away the rest of the day.

That's what we did with anything that was distracting when I was growing up. You can have it on you, but if they see you using it. It goes into the principal's office until EOD.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah the issue with this is that it becomes a major pain to enforce.

Tones of schools have no phone policies but no one enforces it.

Students won't give them up and parents get upset because they can't contact little Timmy or because his 1500 iPhone is in someone's desk.

[–] Tinks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't necessarily need to take it away, there are other avenues of punishment. Detention, Saturday school, no extra-curricular participation, suspension, etc. I was in high school right as dumb cell phones started to become a thing and those were our punishments if we were caught with phones out. We were allowed to have them, but they had to be either off or on silent, and in our bags (same as CD/MP3 players.) We were allowed to have them out to check them only during lunch and before and after school, or if we had to make a call, in the main office. I completely agree that kids shouldn't be using phones AT ALL during class time, but there's ways to allow them to exist and punish inappropriate usage that doesn't require teachers taking them. Teachers shouldn't be taking phones, that's a liability risk and not worth the effort.

Every school in America is currently trying this approach, and it is failing miserably. It's not as easy to enforce as you imagine.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How would it help for children to have phones during a school shooting? Everyone on the staff already has one.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

For real. What are they gonna do if their kid specifically calls them directly? Go all Rambo on the shooter?

[–] dil@piefed.zip 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

A parent is more likely to go rambo and be helpful than cops or teachers, just look at past school shootings where cops didnt do jack sht

[–] isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

The cops definitely need to act quickly. But no one is helped by a bunch of parents wandering around the scene of an active school shooter. Hell, half of them will bring their own guns, now you have multiple people without school credentials wandering around armed on campus. And the police have to chase after them instead of the actual shooter.

This is one of those cases where by trying to help your own kid, you're actually putting them and a lot of other kids at increased danger.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

I'm a man with a very particular set of skills...

[–] Zink@programming.dev 15 points 1 day ago

Go after the companies

Sir this is a Merica.

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

As a mom of two in a country where school shootings do happen far more frequently than anywhere else in the world, the US, I fully support completely banning phones from schools. The benefit to my kids education overall far outweighs the minuscule chance something would happen where they need their phones or a shooting took place. I say this also as a former American student who’s school did go on lock down a few times for active shooters in the area, like the time a local bank got robbed or when they found a “kill list” some kid made. It just doesn’t make sense to me to degrade education across the board in the very very off chance my kid, or even myself, was at the location of a school shooting.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you suggesting a phone would stop the shooting?

[–] pasdechance@jlai.lu 2 points 1 day ago

I was thinking about a shooting that happened in Norway. Some of the children called their parents. It didn't stop anything horrible from happening, but they left the world knowing they were loved.