▲ 349 ▼ We are way, way past propaganda (europe.pub) submitted 1 month ago by mrsilkworm@piefed.social to c/politicalhumor@lemmy.world 154 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 90 points 1 month ago (7 children) No Reagan, Bush Sr., or Bush Jr.? And no Nixon? permalink fedilink source hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (2 children) I'm a bit surprised he didn't include Reagan. A lot of conservative boomers think the sun shone out of Reagan's ass. I know most of them are now fully in the Cult of Trump. But Ronnie's exclusive still seems like an unnecessarily risky move. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rimu@piefed.social 16 points 1 month ago Though if they included Reagan then people would be comparing Reagan's policies with trump's policies and seeing how different they are. And yet if they did include Reagan they would have to put him high up. Awkward. permalink fedilink source parent [+] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago* [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Eq0@literature.cafe 9 points 1 month ago (2 children) You believe he actually thought about this? He asked a random AI to do it and never checked it at all. Maybe to see where Obama ended up permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 child) There are no modern republicans on it and that’s not by chance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago Yeah he didn't want to anger anyone by saying Bush sucked or that he was better than Reagan. Definitely intentional. permalink fedilink source parent [–] EtnaAtsume@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago No Eisenhower either. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (2 children) I'm a bit surprised he didn't include Reagan. A lot of conservative boomers think the sun shone out of Reagan's ass. I know most of them are now fully in the Cult of Trump. But Ronnie's exclusive still seems like an unnecessarily risky move. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rimu@piefed.social 16 points 1 month ago Though if they included Reagan then people would be comparing Reagan's policies with trump's policies and seeing how different they are. And yet if they did include Reagan they would have to put him high up. Awkward. permalink fedilink source parent [+] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago* [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rimu@piefed.social 16 points 1 month ago Though if they included Reagan then people would be comparing Reagan's policies with trump's policies and seeing how different they are. And yet if they did include Reagan they would have to put him high up. Awkward. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 9 points 1 month ago (2 children) You believe he actually thought about this? He asked a random AI to do it and never checked it at all. Maybe to see where Obama ended up permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 child) There are no modern republicans on it and that’s not by chance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago Yeah he didn't want to anger anyone by saying Bush sucked or that he was better than Reagan. Definitely intentional. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 child) There are no modern republicans on it and that’s not by chance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago Yeah he didn't want to anger anyone by saying Bush sucked or that he was better than Reagan. Definitely intentional. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago Yeah he didn't want to anger anyone by saying Bush sucked or that he was better than Reagan. Definitely intentional. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EtnaAtsume@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago No Eisenhower either. permalink fedilink source parent