▲ 253 ▼ Stopping the smart TV from being used against you. (www.s-config.com) submitted 1 month ago* by inari@piefed.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world 62 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (8 children) This. Everything is this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] bigmclargehuge@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 month ago (7 children) My fear is that this will change. We already saw LG load malware via windows when connected. So in theory future devices like Roku and Apple TV could act as a proxy for the tv. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] harmbugler@piefed.social 20 points 1 month ago (3 children) I also fear we will have to install faraday mesh in our walls when these things start arriving with their own internet connection to collect your data and show you ads. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] boatswain@infosec.pub 6 points 1 month ago (2 children) There's paint for that: https://ecospaints.net/browse-all/emr-shielding-paint I've heard blackboard paint works as well: https://smartersurfaces.com/product/black-chalkboard-paint/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 9 points 1 month ago (1 child) I can only imagine how this would totally screw with cell signal and probably generic interference with wanted wireless tech. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago As someone who lives in an older style house that totally screws with cell reception “Wi-Fi Calling” makes all the difference permalink fedilink source parent [–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago So in theory future devices like Roku This is your reminder that the Roku company is currently in the process of being purchased by Fox News. No, I'm not joking. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago They could but why would they? Roku sells data on you already and has limited things to gain from teaming up on the off chance you’re using a second source for content. Apple sells on the basis of privacy for a higher price and if they’re getting into that game like Roku they’d just spy themselves and not help a competitor on the chance a consumer has blocked it. If anything Roku and others being able to say “we have data on people TV makers don’t” increases their own value proposition. The real risk IMO is on device analysis and built in cellular modems sending this data. That and things like Amazon sidewalk meaning your neighbor’s Alexa device passes it on for a fee. That and just refusing to work without internet of course. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago We already saw LG load malware via windows when connected. This was 100% a Windows driver issue as opposed to a TV issue. And I could see possibly Roku doing this, but not Apple. Apple being Unix based precludes the type of driver loading that Windows is susceptible to. Same goes for Linux. Just use Linux. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bigmclargehuge@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 month ago (7 children) My fear is that this will change. We already saw LG load malware via windows when connected. So in theory future devices like Roku and Apple TV could act as a proxy for the tv. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] harmbugler@piefed.social 20 points 1 month ago (3 children) I also fear we will have to install faraday mesh in our walls when these things start arriving with their own internet connection to collect your data and show you ads. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] boatswain@infosec.pub 6 points 1 month ago (2 children) There's paint for that: https://ecospaints.net/browse-all/emr-shielding-paint I've heard blackboard paint works as well: https://smartersurfaces.com/product/black-chalkboard-paint/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 9 points 1 month ago (1 child) I can only imagine how this would totally screw with cell signal and probably generic interference with wanted wireless tech. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago As someone who lives in an older style house that totally screws with cell reception “Wi-Fi Calling” makes all the difference permalink fedilink source parent [–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago So in theory future devices like Roku This is your reminder that the Roku company is currently in the process of being purchased by Fox News. No, I'm not joking. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago They could but why would they? Roku sells data on you already and has limited things to gain from teaming up on the off chance you’re using a second source for content. Apple sells on the basis of privacy for a higher price and if they’re getting into that game like Roku they’d just spy themselves and not help a competitor on the chance a consumer has blocked it. If anything Roku and others being able to say “we have data on people TV makers don’t” increases their own value proposition. The real risk IMO is on device analysis and built in cellular modems sending this data. That and things like Amazon sidewalk meaning your neighbor’s Alexa device passes it on for a fee. That and just refusing to work without internet of course. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago We already saw LG load malware via windows when connected. This was 100% a Windows driver issue as opposed to a TV issue. And I could see possibly Roku doing this, but not Apple. Apple being Unix based precludes the type of driver loading that Windows is susceptible to. Same goes for Linux. Just use Linux. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] harmbugler@piefed.social 20 points 1 month ago (3 children) I also fear we will have to install faraday mesh in our walls when these things start arriving with their own internet connection to collect your data and show you ads. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] boatswain@infosec.pub 6 points 1 month ago (2 children) There's paint for that: https://ecospaints.net/browse-all/emr-shielding-paint I've heard blackboard paint works as well: https://smartersurfaces.com/product/black-chalkboard-paint/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 9 points 1 month ago (1 child) I can only imagine how this would totally screw with cell signal and probably generic interference with wanted wireless tech. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago As someone who lives in an older style house that totally screws with cell reception “Wi-Fi Calling” makes all the difference permalink fedilink source parent
[–] boatswain@infosec.pub 6 points 1 month ago (2 children) There's paint for that: https://ecospaints.net/browse-all/emr-shielding-paint I've heard blackboard paint works as well: https://smartersurfaces.com/product/black-chalkboard-paint/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 9 points 1 month ago (1 child) I can only imagine how this would totally screw with cell signal and probably generic interference with wanted wireless tech. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago As someone who lives in an older style house that totally screws with cell reception “Wi-Fi Calling” makes all the difference permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 9 points 1 month ago (1 child) I can only imagine how this would totally screw with cell signal and probably generic interference with wanted wireless tech. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago As someone who lives in an older style house that totally screws with cell reception “Wi-Fi Calling” makes all the difference permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago As someone who lives in an older style house that totally screws with cell reception “Wi-Fi Calling” makes all the difference permalink fedilink source parent
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago So in theory future devices like Roku This is your reminder that the Roku company is currently in the process of being purchased by Fox News. No, I'm not joking. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago They could but why would they? Roku sells data on you already and has limited things to gain from teaming up on the off chance you’re using a second source for content. Apple sells on the basis of privacy for a higher price and if they’re getting into that game like Roku they’d just spy themselves and not help a competitor on the chance a consumer has blocked it. If anything Roku and others being able to say “we have data on people TV makers don’t” increases their own value proposition. The real risk IMO is on device analysis and built in cellular modems sending this data. That and things like Amazon sidewalk meaning your neighbor’s Alexa device passes it on for a fee. That and just refusing to work without internet of course. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago We already saw LG load malware via windows when connected. This was 100% a Windows driver issue as opposed to a TV issue. And I could see possibly Roku doing this, but not Apple. Apple being Unix based precludes the type of driver loading that Windows is susceptible to. Same goes for Linux. Just use Linux. permalink fedilink source parent