you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)
  • [+] -14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    That would be so if Agent Krasnov hadn’t squandered NATO’s defensive weapons on a stock manipulation scheme in the Hormuz Strait. Russia could bombard Berlin or Brussels with ballistic missiles (of which it has a growing surplus) in the same way it is bombarding Kyiv, as there are no more Patriot interceptors and won’t be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago

    While the ballistic missiles certainly damage Kyiv and its people, they haven't pushed them into surrender. I don't see how spreading out the ballistic missiles Russia has to more countries, who will then join the war more actively, would help them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    You know what Germany did with the Blitz in London in WW2 ? It didnt bring Britain to surrender. Kyiv also does not surrender.

    Non Atomic Air Bombardments cause damage but they dont win wars in most cases. Why would they here ?

  • source
  • parent