Since 1 September, Austria has banned headscarves for female pupils under 14 at state and private schools. Repeated breaches of the rule could lead to fines of €150 to €800 for parents.

Since the start of the 2026/27 school year on 1 September, female pupils in Austria under the age of 14 have been prohibited from wearing any headscarf at school that "covers the head in line with Islamic traditions."

Teachers' representatives say the new rule has generally been implemented calmly and respectfully. At the same time, some schools have reported conflicts and, in some cases, aggressive reactions.

The new law was already controversial before it came into force, with critics questioning whether it was compatible with freedom of religion and the principle of equality.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 58 points 2 weeks ago (16 children)

The exact wording isn't clear, but if it really is just Islamic clothing, then it's a bad law.

If it were more generalized, such as "no one under 14 is allowed to follow religion enforced dress codes, such as..." Which also included dresses, skullcaps, head coverings of all kinds, etc. inside of a school, that would be a lot more reasonable.

But a law targeting one religion, and ignoring others, just reeks of bigotry.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

    Actually the law you described would suck ass as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    I'd be for it, religious indoctrination and gas lighting kids is nothing but abuse. i'd raise the age to 18 though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Writing vagueness into your law just allows for selective enforcement.

    Guess what groups would be targeted?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Sure. Although I would argue that hijabs are a bit more pronounced in terms of oppressive clothing than, let's say a simple dress.

    Therefore I count this as a win in my book. Leave superstitious habits where they belong: in private, at home.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 1 week ago

    Then they will wear them at home. And they will never leave the home, because the law prohibits them from leaving home in the garb required of their religion.

    You and I can call this clothing oppressive, but in prohibiting her from wearing it, we are also her oppressers.

  • source
  • parent