Steam Frame Release (store.steampowered.com)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by to c/steamdeck@sopuli.xyz
 

256 GB model: $1,059 USD

1TB model: $1,299 USD

Preorder list randomized, goes out Sept 17th

Power supply not included, costs $29 (same as Steam Deck power supply)

3rd party addon available for color passthrough, Arcturus Vision Camera, $149

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 39 points 1 month ago (62 children)

Actually not terrible. Wow.

  • source
  • hideshow 62 child comments
  • [+] -18 points 1 month ago (61 children)

    $1050 is not terrible for you? Ok...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 61 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 month ago (36 children)

    I think a lot of people were worried that it would be ~2k from the way they were talking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 36 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (35 children)

    So still terrible but slightly less so? Specially considering the accessories (except the charger) are required according to reviewers. So the "real" minimum price is like $1400. And on top of it all it has monochrome passthrough? I really don't see why people would buy this thing. I really wanted to get one but can't justify the price.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 35 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    They said they were going for a price under the Index 999€ price point.

    Then the rampocalypse happened, and they said they weren't going to make it. I was expecting a 1200€ minimum.

    So only being like 50€ over their target is not really bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -5 points 1 month ago

    Well, it is highly likely that at least some of the accessories were at one point just part of the base product. So I think they were off by quite a bit more than $50. Even so, being above an already pretty high target price IS bad imo.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    The accessories are only $50 total besides the charger. So no, the "real minimum price" isn't $1400. Quit fucking lying

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Accessories kit - $60 Charger + cable - $30 Headstrap + headphones and battery - announced, no price yet. Please note that, for some reason, there is no 3.5mm jack. If you want to use an external battery and headphones, you'll have to buy some sort of splitter.

    So yeah, far lower at $1149. It's still way too expensive.

    Lastly, take a chill pill. Sounds like you need it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

    The accessories kit is really the only "mandatory" thing on this list due to the hand straps for the controllers. The top strap for the headset seems to be personal taste with some people hating it and some people needing it.

    Charger + cable - $30

    Most people already have chargers and cables for this, even for 45W.

    Please note that, for some reason, there is no 3.5mm jack

    This has been a thing with smartphones and motherboards for years. This is too old to actually ve an argument anymore. If someone wants to use 3mm jack they most likely already have a splitter

    Headstrap + headphones and battery - announced, no price yet

    That's not really even announced yet. It's an "fyi we're wanting to drop this in a few months" they told reviewers

    Quite being pedantic just because you got called out for being wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    You need to use a double linebreak after a quote to separate your response btw.

    Most people already have chargers and cables for this, even for 45W.

    Do you have any type of source for this? I know plenty of people that only have a 15/20w charger for their phone.

    This has been a thing with smartphones and motherboards for years. This is too old to actually ve an argument anymore. If someone wants to use 3mm jack they most likely already have a splitter

    It's been a problem for years, yes. That doesn't make it less of a problem. Also, I've yet to see a single motherboard that doesn't have a 3.5mm jack. Lastly, why would you assume that they'd have a splitter? Now you're not only expected to have dongles but also splitters? For a device that costs over 1k? Honestly, you're playing yourself if you really think this isn't an issue.

    That's not really even announced yet. It's an "fyi we're wanting to dp this in a few months" they told reviewers

    That's irrelevant. If you want to use it standalone or for a long period of time, this "accessory" will be a requirement.

    Quite being pedantic just because you got called out for being wrong.

    Having a different opinion is not something you can be right or wrong about. There's this wonderful thing called "points of view". You might want to look into it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Quite being pedantic just because you got called out for being wrong. Having a different opinion is not something you can be right or wrong about. There's this wonderful thing called "points of view". You might want to look into it.

    Here's (roughly) what you said: "Wah, Valve's scamming us! They're charging so much for acceasories that the minimum price is actually $1400!!!1!"

    As you admitted (after I called you out), the $1400 claim is factually untrue. That is not a "difference of opinion"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago

    It kinda depends on the price of the headstrap but yes, I made a mistake and admitted it. Is there something with that??1?

    My point was something different and you missed it. You also made several false claims and 1 very dumb one but seem to be unable to admit it. But sure, by all means, use a lot of exclamation marks and feel as outraged as you want buddy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (25 children)

    Why is everyone so concerned with passthrough these days? MR apps are the worst XR apps of them all

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago*

    For now. Software is constantly changing. Plus, even my very old gearvr had color pasthrough.

    And, when you consider that valve is partially putting out this device to stoke vr/ar/mr enthusiasm, I would have liked to try a headset with great pasthrough. I tried the apple headset right as it came out in a store, and the headset was awesome, but lived in a closed wall garden. The passthrough on it was awesome. That xr keeps taking steps backwards is tragic every single time.

    I guess now I know what it must've been like in the 80s when vr was this cool tehcno fantasy that went nowhere until basically palmer lucky spits on floor.

    Edit: i forgot to really answer. Because passthrough is part of vr. Also because it's cool. Also because it's still novel to me and I want to play with it. Also because maybe I would have made something with it. Also because backwards progress is sad and annoying and feels bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (23 children)

    IYKYK...

    All jokes aside, one reason is MR to watch a movie while being able to see outside. Another is when you kneed to step out of the room for just a moment or talk to someone that just came in or maybe even just grab the controllers while seeing what you're doing.

    Do you really think cameras with color are that much of an ask in 2026 on a device that costs over $1k?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago* (15 children)

    The addon costs $150, if they increased the price by $150 and had color passthrough included in the box, you would be happy, but everyone who would be forced to buy cameras for a use case they are not interested in wouldn't be.

    Imo all of your use cases for color passthrough are weak. You want distractions from a movie? You need to step outside, take the headset off lol.

    If they launched at $1200 way more people would be complaining about the price

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (3 children)

    They're already using a literal phone soc that HAS CAMERAS. Having two color cameras on board probably would have cost much much less than an external, $150, third party module, like maybe a tenth of that at scale so like maybe $15 more. OoooOOOOOooooo scary

    They likely made compromises like this all over the device to keep the price as low as possible, this (and the ergo pack) is just one that they errored on and probably should have just included.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    Why would internal cameras be significantly cheaper than the external cameras to produce? Isn't it the same hardware with the same pcie interface?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 weeks ago* (10 children)

    Like the other guy said, using color cameras would not have costed much more. This is an expensive device with some budget entry-level features. There's no excuse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago (9 children)

    If you think they were targeting an "expensive device" when they were designing this, you're completely misunderstanding the product and the current market conditions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 weeks ago (8 children)

    You read the marketing material, nice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago (7 children)

    An expensive vr device would be the apple vision pro. This is not that, you seem to think valve knew that ram and storage would triple in price over the last 2 years and designed the frame with that in mind.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 weeks ago (6 children)

    That's a dumb device, not just a stupidly expensive one. There's a reason why it was discontinued.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

    Are you just making shit up? It's not discontinued at all, you can buy one today? https://www.apple.com/apple-vision-pro/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

    There are lots of articles about it since January. Example.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago (3 children)

    So words have meanings, discontinued means discontinued, not "there's a rumor that they are no longer working on it"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    If they still have it for sale ir means that they have stock, not that they're necessarily still manufacturing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (6 children)

    I just assumed they were more performant for their actual task of tracking. Everything else is secondary.

    This is just an assumption, but, if true, give me the improved tracking over color passthrough any day.

    Not that color passthrough wouldn't be nice. But I don't think it's a cost saving technique

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago (5 children)

    Well, I happen tl have dabbled a bit in image processing and applying a mask to make the image grayscale has a negligible (if not inexistent) impact in performance. I do admit that I'm unaware if there's another characteristic this cameras have that make them better for tracking. If they do, it's pretty weird that Valve hasn't mentioned it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago (4 children)

    Applying a mask? I'm pretty sure the cameras themselves are black and white only, no color, specifically to increase tracking performance.

    Something about b and w cameras being more sensitive to light?

    You wouldn't get the same benefit from applying a mask I don't think.

    But again, IDK for sure.

    If I really need color, I'll get the aftermarket adapter, probably do a better job than any built in cameras anyway 🤷‍♂️

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago (3 children)

    I'm saying that if a grayscale image was required, you can use a color camera to show that to the user and apply a mask to use a grayscale image for tracking processes.

    You wouldn't get the same benefit from applying a mask I don't think.

    Maybe, not sure. But then again, why wouldn't valve say so if that was the case?

    If I really need color, I'll get the aftermarket adapter, probably do a better job than any built in cameras anyway 🤷‍♂️

    This one's kinda dumb, sorry. Valve makes the device and they make the camera accessory as well. If the cameras were built-in and used a ribbon cable instead of usb-c, the quality would quite literally be exactly the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    I think the grayscale camera literally, physically, is better at collecting light. Like, the hardware is more capable when it comes to tracking.

    Maybe negligibly so, but an amount.

    I'm not saying that it was the right call to use them, I just didn't think it's as bad as everyone seems to want it to be.

    Maybe valve will defend their decision more in the future? Maybe the black and white cams, in addition to being better for low light tracking, were also cheaper in bulk?

    Cost adds up. I'm also in the boat of not wanting the charger to be included, because I and many others, will never use it.

    As for the addon cameras being better, it's not dumb. They literally connect with a special high bandwidth connector, and they are something like twice the resolution.

    Just like I wouldn't want the charger included that I wouldn't use, many others wouldn't appreciate the extra $150 to have the high res cameras be default either.

    It's mostly a difference of opinion and preference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    I think the grayscale camera literally, physically, is better at collecting light. Like, the hardware is more capable when it comes to tracking.

    There are several headsets with color cameras and no tracking issues. Even if they are "better", if they don't provide a real world benefit it doesn't make sense to use them.

    Cost adds up.

    We're talking about a $1k+ device here. I don't think people would've drawn the line at $20 more.

    As for the addon cameras being better, it's not dumb. They literally connect with a special high bandwidth connector, and they are something like twice the resolution.

    And what makes you think that they couldn't have used the exact same cameras inside the Frame? Why do you assume that this external "high bandwidth" connector is the only way to use them? I'm sorry but yes, it is dumb.

    Just like I wouldn't want the charger included that I wouldn't use, many others wouldn't appreciate the extra $150 to have the high res cameras be default either.

    First, a decent 45w charger is like $15 nowadays so that wouldn't make that much of a difference. Second, why do you keep insisting that including the cameras would've increased the price $150? That makes 0 sense. First, if you don't use the monochrome cameras, you "recover" that money and second, if you include them in the device you don't have any extra packaging and you don't need the enclosure or anything else. The price increase would've been far far lower.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (24 replies)
  • load more comments (24 replies)