you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 24 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Bisexuals have a cooler flag, pretty sure that's the only difference. Otherwise they're both labels that fail to adequately describe the infinitely personal and variable elements of human attraction and sexuality. Use whichever one feels right. I flip between bi and pan when labeling myself but omnisexual probably "fits" the best

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 2 weeks ago*

    Problem: There are 2 competing labels for universal attraction

    Solution: "Omnisexual should represent universal attraction"

    Problem: there are 3 competing labels for universal attraction

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Isn't that just changing it from the Greek pan prefix to Latin omni prefix, both meaning all?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    Omnisexuality is differentiated from bi/pan in recognizing the role of gender in attraction, and expresses a.preference for certain genders over others. For example, I'm mostly attracted to fem, queer, or androgynous presenting people, and not particularly drawn to masc people. I am attracted to some men (amab or.afab), but not to the same degree as I am with other gender expressions

  • source
  • parent