you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I was thinking about IPoAC the other day and had a horrifying realisation of it's implications: teleporting someone will involve moving enough data to reconstitute an identical human being from the sending to the recieving teleporter, and assuming storage technology grows in a similar way, there will be a point where it's faster to be downloaded to a drive, strapped to a pigeon, and flown to your destination for reconstitution than it will be to wait for the data to transfer over.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    You are somehow assuming

    1. the amount of data to reconstitute an identical human being would increase in meaningful quantities over time
    2. transfer bandwidths are not also growing to the point where finite amounts of data are transmitted between two points faster than a pidgeon can fly

    Did you confuse this with the scenario of average bandwidth?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    No, the assumptions are that it would be a static but massive amount of data and that transfer bandwidths grow slower than can keep up with storage volume, which is why there would be a point rather than multiple ones. At some point the bandwidth would outgrow the data and forever more be faster at the task than IPoAC.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    You phrased that weirdly then. As if that point would be in the future, with an initial phase of transfer by radio.

    Btw, that "IPoAC" could then easily be replaced by putting a human on a plane :p

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment