top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 102 points 2 weeks ago (13 children)

Damn, I was going to ship of Theseus you about the cells in your body replacing themselves constantly, but apparently our brain neurons last a lifetime.

Now I don't think I would ever use a teleporter, either. Shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    Just believe we're inside a simulation and transporters won't matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Its kinda crazy actually if you think about it, our ability to anticipate actions is our ability to land in outcomes expected to be made by the reality generating around us if you imagine the reality outside our bodily sensory input as a big monte carlo field of potentials in the form of intertwined variables...like a big llm.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago

    muscle cells too. the muscle cells you have now are the same cells you had as a kid (not entirely sure how far back it goes). they dont even divide when you gain muscle, the cells just get bigger and absorb nuclei from neighboring cells to support the extra mass. the cool thing is the nuclei stick around even if you let the muscles atrophy, so theyre forever changed by having once been big. thats probably part of why its easier to get back to muscle size youve been at before.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 61 points 2 weeks ago (21 children)

    A distinction between a teleporter and a transporter...

    To teleport implies the original matter is instantly moved from one place to another so there would be no destruction and reconstituted copy. A wormhole would seem to be the only realistic way that could be achieved.

    A transporter, well that means copy then kill. No one knows if the kill part is painful because noone survives it. I find it funny Riker's copy is actually the "original" and his lack of death is considered a transporter accident. Yet he is the one treated like the copy...

    And all that said, barclay's experience in the transporter beam is more suggestive of a wormhole style device.

    I don't know why I bothered to write all this out...

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    Iirc Thomas is not Will’s copy. Basically the transporter has a malfunction where Thomas and Will are both constituted on a transporter pad. So both are the “original” and also both are neither. In a sense, the William Thomas Riker who stepped onto that pad that day ceased to be, forked into two different lives.

    I used to use this episode to talk about identity when I taught ethics back in the day. Both men carried on their lives under the belief that they were the same man who stepped onto a transporter pad on Nervala IV. Their experiences defined who they were, demonstrating that it’s more than biological material that makes any one of us us.

    Now the deeper question is: since you can’t add matter to the universe, what’s missing to give life to two Rikers?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    The are other methods from Star Trek that could potentially be size as well.

    Like "hey you actually travel through this other dimension where your physical form is undisturbed and no time passes in this dimension"

    Which sounds ok, but "by the way it's kinda a hell-dimension and your consciousness gets tortured for a distance-relative time there but won't retain the memories after..."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 48 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

    I would be the guy who says, "Open-source teleporters only."

    I ain't risking having myself modified surreptitiously. 😑

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 47 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    My grandma won't drive on the interstate. These are the same.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 32 points 2 weeks ago* (3 children)

    I always liked the idea of teleporters that are just wormhole pairs.

    If you want to travel from New York to Paris you have to first go to your local wormhole station, walk through that and be taken to the central station for all US wormholes, walk over to the international portal and be taken to the global interface station, which would be located wherever the electricity is cheapest so probably somewhere in Iceland, then you walk over to the French national station, and be taken to some facility in France, and then from there walk over to the Paris wormhole.

    All wormholes are 20 m across by standard allowing cargo containers to transport through, with the Americans have made system unnecessarily complicated by standardizing their wormholes to 2.5 giraffe widths.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 29 points 2 weeks ago* (10 children)

    Everyone always focuses on the Ship of Theseus or the existential parts of this, but the societal impacts would be crazy.

    Millions of people teleporting to the most beautiful places on earth and wrecking them, highways and boring parts of cities abandoned, mass death of people teleporting into a crush crowd at Mecca, landmarks toppled under the weight of teleporting tourists and bosses teleporting into your house for a "work from home" meeting, weapons and bombs being teleported into war zones...

    Things would eventually find a new normal and teleporting food and resources around would remove the need for ships and trucks, you could explore the world much more easily and there would be lots of science to do in hard to reach places, marine biologists would have a field day exploring the deep ocean, doctors could teleport cancer cells out of patients, space agencies teleport probes, bases and astronauts to the moon and around the solar system...

    Like it would be such a huge upheaval with so many implications. It's interesting that people really fixate on the "would I die though? What does dying even mean if I'm still around?" part, even though I think that's maybe the least interesting thing. I guess it taps into a very primal survival instinct?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 29 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

    Sleeping is just teleporting 8 hours into the future and life is just continuous reconstitution anyways.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    Exactly. The "me" of yesterday is already dead. He can't think, feel, act, reason, or anything else. I have memories of being him, but if I'd suffered head trauma, even those could be gone. The illusion of continuous, conscious experience is just that—an illusion.

    The young-Earth people say that their god created the world about 6,000 years ago, and planted fossils to test our faith. I say that my god created the universe 6 seconds ago, including these memories that we seem to have. There's literally no way to prove otherwise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 28 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    Warhammer 40k: Can I interest you in a trip through literal hell?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 25 points 2 weeks ago (13 children)

    With the current constant scanning an analyzing and advertising pushed on us, I'd stay far as fuck away from any teleporting service....

    If they have the tech to disassemble and reassemble you including memories, then they can manipulate that.

    Would you trust Google Instant Transport Services to not tune your personality to be more favorable toward products from their ad partners, or just slightly tune your political opinions to be more inline with their own.

    Just a slight adjustment, an active protester against new datacenters would become less aggressive, a random person starts buying more Pepsi instead of Coke, a change small enough that no one notices a big change in behavior.

    Also, would you trust that your memories would stay private?

    I am mashing my thumb raw by obliterating X.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 24 points 2 weeks ago (23 children)

    I’d use a teleporter with no hesitation. What’s important is my memories and sense of self, not the actual meat it’s in. I could find out I’m a copy of myself right now and not be bothered.

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

    Yeah but once you step in the teleporter you stop being. The copy is only useful for other people to keep interacting with your clone, but the actual you is dead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 20 points 2 weeks ago* (10 children)

    I've said it before and I'll say it again:

    In the TNG episode Lonely Among Us Captain Picard gets taken over by an alien energy being. It hijacks his body and he teleports himself into a cloud of dispersed particles in a nebula. They spend more than an hour trying to recover him, and are about to give up, when Troi senses his consciousness, and they are able to reconstitute him through the transporter. This, and other mentions of "mental energy" in the show indicate that there is a canonical, scientific proof of the existence of the soul independent from the body, and that it can be transported without damage.

    Anything more involved than that gets into philosophical debates about whether or not you die every time you go to sleep, and is about as useful a conversation as whether or not you can "know" if you are or aren't a brain in a jar.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 18 points 2 weeks ago (19 children)

    The bit I find worrying is that you'd have to trust you will be 1:1 reconstructed at the other side.

    What happens if there's an error on the reconstruction side and it either fails to reconstruct you back properly, or at all?

    Or what if some malicious party injects something into, or removes part of your reconstruction?

    There'd be no way for you to know from the other side, so you could just be killed or maimed in an instant, and there'd be nothing you could do to stop it

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • load more comments (18 replies)
    [–] 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    "What if instead of landing craft, we just used some kind of teleporter thingy? It'd be a lot cheaper over all."

    "Great idea, Gene. I'm sure this won't have any future story repercussions that get way out of hand!"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (9 children)

    Star Trek teleporter: fax machine / shredder combination (remember that time the shredder bit malfunctioned and we got double Riker..?)

    Wormhole: just a weird long gateway (with a chance of spaghettification). No problems there unless it somehow takes you through some sort of hell dimension or something.

    Stargate: somehow both, because let's be frank, the Ancients were kind of dicks. (Also, didn't actually need the whole buffer thing, that one Orlin built in Carter's basement with a box of scraps was completely analog, no computer bits, and it worked just fine until it didn't.)

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 16 points 2 weeks ago
    [–] 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (10 children)

    The ship of thesis is “the ship of thesis” because it is the ship that thesis is using. He could hop off a trireme and on to a “boston whaler” and it would be the ship of thesis.

    Edit: you must live with me spelling sin. I will not alter time and reality to correct that which is.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

    The universe is a hologram, and our physical brain is just an antenna tuned to the higher dimension of consciousness. Your consciousness exists separately to your body, so if the transporter builds an exact copy of your body (and brain) you will just tune back in to your same consciousness when you're done transporting.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 12 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    I was thinking about IPoAC the other day and had a horrifying realisation of it's implications: teleporting someone will involve moving enough data to reconstitute an identical human being from the sending to the recieving teleporter, and assuming storage technology grows in a similar way, there will be a point where it's faster to be downloaded to a drive, strapped to a pigeon, and flown to your destination for reconstitution than it will be to wait for the data to transfer over.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Well, Vulcans canonically have souls. Maybe everyone does?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago

    I used to think like that, but I have my doubts. Doesn't "Realm of Fear" show that you are conscious during the transfer process? So it's kinda like growing new brain synapses and starting to be conscious through them instead of old ones?

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    So the real dilemma here is if you believe in a spirit or after life. Essentially you wouldnt ever get where you were going. But you would.

    Honestly, who's to say that somewhere in the infinity between every second consciousness doesnt jump from one location to another breaking the continuation of persistent matter.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    y'know, it is interesting how fear of teleporters is handled but never stigma against teleportees. this hypothetical star trek grandparent is very understanding, but in the early days of the technology i can imagine many people wouldn't be

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago

    This happens now to you every night. Your stream of consciousness ends forever and a new one is created upon waking.

    Pleasant dreams

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›