you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And in fact, France took the position that it would not enforce the warrant because the court lacks jurisdiction.

The article says France says it's about jurisdiction, but specifically about the idea that a head of state has diplomatic immunity.

If Israel was a signatory that argument couldn't apply because they would have agreed to be subject to the ICC.

Eta more context: https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2024/11/28/why-france-offered-netanyahu-concessions-over-icc-arrest-warrant_6734435_4.html

According to corroborating sources, this statement was meant to avoid severing ties with the Israeli prime minister, who contested the role of mediator claimed by Paris in the search for a hard-fought ceasefire in Lebanon, announced on Tuesday evening by Joe Biden and Emmanuel Macron.

  • source
  • parent