you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 192 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Meta wants to be the global town square, but apparently Virginia Woolf and feminism are too dangerous for its ad system. Meanwhile the company keeps asking us to trust its algorithms with billions of people’s speech. If Meta can’t distinguish feminist literature from prohibited content, maybe it shouldn’t be the internet’s self appointed censor.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 98 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    While allowing scam and porn ads on there that harm millions of people

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    It’s amazing how blantly they allow scam ads. I reported ads for stolen credit cards and counterfeit money and meta closed my reports stating there was nothing wrong with the ads. What is this? The dark web?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago

    Honestly, I think the dark web is a safer concept than X or Meta. The legitimacy of society's most powerful people is far more insidious than backstreet markets and courtesans: they don't make laws or support evil institutions across entire nations, nor able to leverage them as a club.

    The ordinary pickpocket just wants money. A wealthy elite considers other humans to be decorative, to be used and disposed of.

  • source
  • parent